Scholarlink

Background <p>In laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), a skilled scopist is essential for maintaining a clear operative view. We evaluated the scopist’s expertise on surgical outcomes and whether the flexible scope controller type (conventional dual-lever versus joystick) influences the scopist’s learning curve.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively reviewed LLRs performed by a single surgeon between December 2021 and March 2023. Patients with prior hepatectomy, Child–Pugh class B/C, concurrent extrahepatic abdominal surgery, or laparoscopic donor hepatectomy were excluded. Expert scopists (n = 2) had &gt; 7&#xa0;years of experience, whereas beginner scopists (n = 2) had &lt; 6&#xa0;months. Outcomes were compared by expertise and scope type. Learning curves were assessed using linear regression and CUSUM analysis of operative time over case sequence.</p> Results <p>Among 161 LLRs, 82 were performed with expert scopists and 79 with beginner scopists. Compared with the expert group, the beginner group had longer operative time (178.0 vs 139.5&#xa0;min, p &lt; 0.001), more intraoperative transfusions (8.9% vs 0%, p = 0.006), and a higher open conversion rate (6.3% vs 0%, p = 0.012). In 116 procedures using conventional scopes (experts, n = 57; beginners, n = 59), experts had shorter operative time (144.0 vs 178.0&#xa0;min, p = 0.002) and fewer transfusions (0% vs 11.9%, p = 0.013). In 45 procedures using joystick scopes, operative time and transfusion rates did not differ significantly between expert and beginner scopists. In major hepatectomy, both groups showed decreasing operative time with joystick scopes. In minor hepatectomy, experts had shorter operative time with conventional scopes, whereas no significant difference was observed with joystick scopes.</p> Conclusion <p>This study demonstrated that the proficiency of laparoscopists can affect surgical outcomes. Moreover, newly learning laparoscopists may acquire proficiency more rapidly when using joystick-controlled laparoscopes compared to conventional ones. In procedures like minor hepatectomy, which are relatively simpler, it was confirmed that there is no significant difference in proficiency when compared to expert scopists.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of learning curve difference of laparoscopist according to controller type of flexible scope during laparoscopic liver resection

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月20日

查看全文
  • Sunghae Park,
  • Namkee Oh,
  • Jinsoo Rhu,
  • Gyu-Seong Choi,
  • Jongman Kim

摘要

Background

In laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), a skilled scopist is essential for maintaining a clear operative view. We evaluated the scopist’s expertise on surgical outcomes and whether the flexible scope controller type (conventional dual-lever versus joystick) influences the scopist’s learning curve.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed LLRs performed by a single surgeon between December 2021 and March 2023. Patients with prior hepatectomy, Child–Pugh class B/C, concurrent extrahepatic abdominal surgery, or laparoscopic donor hepatectomy were excluded. Expert scopists (n = 2) had > 7 years of experience, whereas beginner scopists (n = 2) had < 6 months. Outcomes were compared by expertise and scope type. Learning curves were assessed using linear regression and CUSUM analysis of operative time over case sequence.

Results

Among 161 LLRs, 82 were performed with expert scopists and 79 with beginner scopists. Compared with the expert group, the beginner group had longer operative time (178.0 vs 139.5 min, p < 0.001), more intraoperative transfusions (8.9% vs 0%, p = 0.006), and a higher open conversion rate (6.3% vs 0%, p = 0.012). In 116 procedures using conventional scopes (experts, n = 57; beginners, n = 59), experts had shorter operative time (144.0 vs 178.0 min, p = 0.002) and fewer transfusions (0% vs 11.9%, p = 0.013). In 45 procedures using joystick scopes, operative time and transfusion rates did not differ significantly between expert and beginner scopists. In major hepatectomy, both groups showed decreasing operative time with joystick scopes. In minor hepatectomy, experts had shorter operative time with conventional scopes, whereas no significant difference was observed with joystick scopes.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the proficiency of laparoscopists can affect surgical outcomes. Moreover, newly learning laparoscopists may acquire proficiency more rapidly when using joystick-controlled laparoscopes compared to conventional ones. In procedures like minor hepatectomy, which are relatively simpler, it was confirmed that there is no significant difference in proficiency when compared to expert scopists.