Laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominus plane block versus intraperitoneal irrigation of local anesthetic for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial
摘要
The PROSPECT guidelines provide GRADE A recommendations for paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and port site infiltration (PSI) with local anaesthetic following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Despite varying practice, the optimal method of delivering additional local anesthetic is unclear.
AimTo perform a randomised clinical trial (RCT) evaluating the value of laparoscopic-delivered transversus abdominal plane block (L-TAP) compared to intraperitoneal infiltration (IP) in addition to PSI in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
MethodsA multicentre RCT was performed during a 7-month recruitment period (March–October 2025) across 6 hospitals. Patients were randomised on a 1:1 basis to L-TAP or IP. The primary outcome was postoperative visual analogue scores (VAS). Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed.
Results147 patients were recruited, of whom, 135 underwent final analysis. Of these, 49.6% were allocated to IP (67/135) and 50.1% to L-TAP (68/135). A non-significant difference was observed in baseline clinical information between groups (P > 0.050). A significant reduction in mean VAS was observed in favour of L-TAP at 6-h (IP: 3.3 (standard deviation (SD): 0.3) vs. L-TAP: 2.3 (SD: 0.3), P = 0.014) and 24-h (IP: 3.1 (SD: 0.4) vs. L-TAP: 1.6 (SD: 0.4), P = 0.008), with a trend towards significance at 12-h (IP: 3.5 (SD: 0.4) vs. L-TAP: 2.5 (SD: 0.4), P = 0.063). Moreover, regression analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in VAS following TAP (beta-coefficient: -0.681, standard error: 0.281, P = 0.015), however, a non-significant difference in ‘breakthrough’ opioid and morphine equivalent consumption was noted between groups (P > 0.050). There was a non-significant difference in surgical data, postoperative outcomes, and quality of life metrics between groups (P > 0.050).
ConclusionThis study demonstrates the superiority of L-TAP compared to IP in reducing postoperative pain, as measured VAS scores, in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.