Scholarlink

Objective <p>To evaluate whether a low-cost, automated tool using trajectory-based metrics and real-time computer vision can objectively assess laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) skill and distinguish between levels of surgical experience.</p> Summary background data <p>Laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) is essential to the safety and success of minimally invasive surgery. Despite its importance, LCN is often overlooked in formal training and lacks standardized assessment methods. Existing tools are labor-intensive, subjective, and not scalable, creating a need for efficient, objective evaluation strategies.</p> Methods <p>This cross-sectional observational validation study was conducted from January to April 2025 in a single-site academic surgical training laboratory. Fifty-nine participants (6 expert surgeons, 12 senior residents, 26 junior residents, and 15 novices) completed a standardized LCN task using a custom-designed maze and a 30° laparoscope in a bench-top trainer. Real-time computer vision detected targets, while an electromagnetic tracking system recorded the laparoscope’s trajectory. Five automated performance metrics were collected: space coverage, dimensionless jerk, rotational smoothness, idle time, and total task time. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to generate a composite performance score (0–100).</p> Results <p>All participants completed the task. Experts demonstrated lower space coverage (121 ± 31&#xa0;cm<sup>2</sup>) and shorter completion times (163 ± 59&#xa0;s) compared with novices (205 ± 67&#xa0;cm<sup>2</sup>; 497 ± 133&#xa0;s). Experts also outperformed novices in jerk, rotational smoothness, and idle time metrics. PCA-derived scores were significantly higher for experts (92 ± 3) than novices (34 ± 24), with all metrics showing statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> &lt; .005).</p> Conclusions <p>This automated, low-cost tool reliably quantified LCN skill across training levels using interpretable metrics. Its objectivity and scalability support integration into surgical education for formative feedback and standardized assessment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantitative assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation skill: a retrospective cross-sectional study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月23日

查看全文
  • Annika Lindstrom Haughey,
  • Shannon Barter,
  • Cameron Reid,
  • Steven Thornton,
  • Sabino Zani,
  • Katharine Louise Jackson,
  • Brian Mann

摘要

Objective

To evaluate whether a low-cost, automated tool using trajectory-based metrics and real-time computer vision can objectively assess laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) skill and distinguish between levels of surgical experience.

Summary background data

Laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN) is essential to the safety and success of minimally invasive surgery. Despite its importance, LCN is often overlooked in formal training and lacks standardized assessment methods. Existing tools are labor-intensive, subjective, and not scalable, creating a need for efficient, objective evaluation strategies.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational validation study was conducted from January to April 2025 in a single-site academic surgical training laboratory. Fifty-nine participants (6 expert surgeons, 12 senior residents, 26 junior residents, and 15 novices) completed a standardized LCN task using a custom-designed maze and a 30° laparoscope in a bench-top trainer. Real-time computer vision detected targets, while an electromagnetic tracking system recorded the laparoscope’s trajectory. Five automated performance metrics were collected: space coverage, dimensionless jerk, rotational smoothness, idle time, and total task time. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to generate a composite performance score (0–100).

Results

All participants completed the task. Experts demonstrated lower space coverage (121 ± 31 cm2) and shorter completion times (163 ± 59 s) compared with novices (205 ± 67 cm2; 497 ± 133 s). Experts also outperformed novices in jerk, rotational smoothness, and idle time metrics. PCA-derived scores were significantly higher for experts (92 ± 3) than novices (34 ± 24), with all metrics showing statistically significant differences (p < .005).

Conclusions

This automated, low-cost tool reliably quantified LCN skill across training levels using interpretable metrics. Its objectivity and scalability support integration into surgical education for formative feedback and standardized assessment.