Background <p>The role of near-infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF)-imaging in thyroid surgery is well-established. However, its role in hyperparathyroidism surgery is yet to be defined due to the lack of consensus regarding the autofluorescence (AF) pattern of parathyroid adenomas (PAs). Furthermore, its utility in minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) has yet to be assessed.</p> Objective <p>To assess the feasibility of utilizing NIRAF-imaging via the limited-access of MIVAP and whether PAs demonstrate a unique AF signature allowing NIRAF-imaging to serve as an intraoperative diagnostic tool.</p> Methods <p>The clinical records of patients who underwent MIVAP for hyperparathyroidism between February and October 2024 were retrospectively reviewed.&#xa0;The primary endpoint was to assess the feasibility of NIRAF-imaging in MIVAP and whether PAs demonstrate a defining AF pattern. Secondary endpoints included whether certain AF patterns of PAs correlated with specific PA features including cell type, size, and/or location. Furthermore, operative-time and cost implications were assessed.</p> Results <p>24 consecutive patients underwent MIVAP for hyperparathyroidism. NIRAF-imaging was feasible via the limited-access with no technical difficulties reported. AF patterns included high-intensity AF in 10 (38.5%), low-intensity AF in 10 (38.5%), and cap AF in 6 (23%). A new AF pattern was also described and referred to as “double cap AF”. No significant differences in the patterns of AF were observed (<i>p</i> = 0.2). The pattern of AF did not considerably correlate with the predominant cell type, size or location of the PA. However, mediastinal PAs demonstrated a significantly higher tendency for cap AF. The additional time added to the procedure applying the technology was only a few minutes. However, it conferred a considerable additional cost.</p> Conclusion <p>In experienced hands, a direct minimal-access did not preclude utilizing NIRAF-imaging. PAs seem to lack a uniform characteristic AF signature implying a limited diagnostic role of NIRAF-imaging in parathyroid surgery apart from confirming normal parathyroid tissue.</p> <p>The study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT06779760.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing the feasibility of near infrared autofluorescence imaging in minimally-invasive video assisted parathyroidectomy and the autofluorescence signature of parathyroid adenomas. A single center surgical case series

  • Sohail Bakkar,
  • Angeliki Chorti,
  • Theodosis Papavramidis,
  • Gianluca Donatini,
  • Paolo Miccoli

摘要

Background

The role of near-infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF)-imaging in thyroid surgery is well-established. However, its role in hyperparathyroidism surgery is yet to be defined due to the lack of consensus regarding the autofluorescence (AF) pattern of parathyroid adenomas (PAs). Furthermore, its utility in minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP) has yet to be assessed.

Objective

To assess the feasibility of utilizing NIRAF-imaging via the limited-access of MIVAP and whether PAs demonstrate a unique AF signature allowing NIRAF-imaging to serve as an intraoperative diagnostic tool.

Methods

The clinical records of patients who underwent MIVAP for hyperparathyroidism between February and October 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was to assess the feasibility of NIRAF-imaging in MIVAP and whether PAs demonstrate a defining AF pattern. Secondary endpoints included whether certain AF patterns of PAs correlated with specific PA features including cell type, size, and/or location. Furthermore, operative-time and cost implications were assessed.

Results

24 consecutive patients underwent MIVAP for hyperparathyroidism. NIRAF-imaging was feasible via the limited-access with no technical difficulties reported. AF patterns included high-intensity AF in 10 (38.5%), low-intensity AF in 10 (38.5%), and cap AF in 6 (23%). A new AF pattern was also described and referred to as “double cap AF”. No significant differences in the patterns of AF were observed (p = 0.2). The pattern of AF did not considerably correlate with the predominant cell type, size or location of the PA. However, mediastinal PAs demonstrated a significantly higher tendency for cap AF. The additional time added to the procedure applying the technology was only a few minutes. However, it conferred a considerable additional cost.

Conclusion

In experienced hands, a direct minimal-access did not preclude utilizing NIRAF-imaging. PAs seem to lack a uniform characteristic AF signature implying a limited diagnostic role of NIRAF-imaging in parathyroid surgery apart from confirming normal parathyroid tissue.

The study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT06779760.