<p>For a field <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {F}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and integers <i>d</i>,&#xa0;<i>k</i> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ell \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ℓ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, a set <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A \subseteq \mathbb {F}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mo>⊆</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is called <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((k,\ell )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ℓ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-nearly orthogonal if all vectors in <i>A</i> are non-self-orthogonal and every <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k+1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> vectors in <i>A</i> contain <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ell + 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>ℓ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> pairwise orthogonal vectors. Recently, Haviv, Mattheus, Milojević and Wigderson have improved the lower bound on nearly orthogonal sets over finite fields, using counting arguments and a hypergraph container lemma. They showed that for every prime <i>p</i> and an integer <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ell \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ℓ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, there is a constant <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\delta (p,\ell )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ℓ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> such that for every field <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {F}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of characteristic <i>p</i> and for all integers <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d \ge k \ge \ell + 1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>ℓ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathbb {F}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> contains a <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((k,\ell )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>ℓ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-nearly orthogonal set of size <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(d^{\delta k / \log k}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mi>d</mi> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mi>k</mi> <mo stretchy="false">/</mo> <mo>log</mo> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This nearly matches an upper bound <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left( {\begin{array}{c}d+k\\ k\end{array}}\right) \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow> <mrow /> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> coming from Ramsey theory. Moreover, they proved the same lower bound for the size of a largest set <i>A</i> where for any two subsets of <i>A</i> of size <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k+1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> each, there is a vector in one of the subsets orthogonal to a vector in the other one. We prove a common generalisation of this result, showing that essentially the same lower bound holds for the size of a largest set <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A \subseteq \mathbb {F}^d\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mo>⊆</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </mrow> <mi>d</mi> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with the stronger property that given any family of subsets <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A_1, \ldots , A_{\ell +1} \subseteq A\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mrow> <mi>ℓ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>⊆</mo> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, each of size <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k+1\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we can find a vector in each <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(A_i\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> such that they are all pairwise orthogonal. Rather than combining both counting and container arguments, we make use of a multipartite asymmetric container lemma that allows for non-uniform co-degree conditions. This lemma was first discovered by Campos, Coulson, Serra and Wötzel, and we provide a new and short proof for this lemma.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Multipartite Nearly Orthogonal Sets Over Finite Fields

  • Rajko Nenadov,
  • Lander Verlinde

摘要

For a field \(\mathbb {F}\) F and integers dk and \(\ell \) , a set \(A \subseteq \mathbb {F}^d\) A F d is called \((k,\ell )\) ( k , ) -nearly orthogonal if all vectors in A are non-self-orthogonal and every \(k+1\) k + 1 vectors in A contain \(\ell + 1\) + 1 pairwise orthogonal vectors. Recently, Haviv, Mattheus, Milojević and Wigderson have improved the lower bound on nearly orthogonal sets over finite fields, using counting arguments and a hypergraph container lemma. They showed that for every prime p and an integer \(\ell \) , there is a constant \(\delta (p,\ell )\) δ ( p , ) such that for every field \(\mathbb {F}\) F of characteristic p and for all integers \(d \ge k \ge \ell + 1\) d k + 1 , \(\mathbb {F}^d\) F d contains a \((k,\ell )\) ( k , ) -nearly orthogonal set of size \(d^{\delta k / \log k}\) d δ k / log k . This nearly matches an upper bound \(\left( {\begin{array}{c}d+k\\ k\end{array}}\right) \) d + k k coming from Ramsey theory. Moreover, they proved the same lower bound for the size of a largest set A where for any two subsets of A of size \(k+1\) k + 1 each, there is a vector in one of the subsets orthogonal to a vector in the other one. We prove a common generalisation of this result, showing that essentially the same lower bound holds for the size of a largest set \(A \subseteq \mathbb {F}^d\) A F d with the stronger property that given any family of subsets \(A_1, \ldots , A_{\ell +1} \subseteq A\) A 1 , , A + 1 A , each of size \(k+1\) k + 1 , we can find a vector in each \(A_i\) A i such that they are all pairwise orthogonal. Rather than combining both counting and container arguments, we make use of a multipartite asymmetric container lemma that allows for non-uniform co-degree conditions. This lemma was first discovered by Campos, Coulson, Serra and Wötzel, and we provide a new and short proof for this lemma.