<p>The 2022 Meradalir eruption at Fagradalsfjall, Iceland, provided an opportunity to study mildly explosive volcanic activity of a mafic volcano using video analysis. During a field campaign from 10 to 14 August 2022, we recorded high-resolution videos of explosive activity during the cone-building phase of the eruption. We analyzed 30-min intervals on two days with differing eruptive intensities—12 August (high intensity) and 14 August (low intensity)—to quantify particle exit velocities, particle size distributions, and mass eruption rates. Our results show significant variability in eruptive intensity on short (seconds to minutes) to long (hours to days) timescales. Instantaneous mass eruption rates fluctuated between 10<sup>2</sup> and 10<sup>5</sup>&#xa0;kg/s, with average rates decreasing from 5.5 × 10<sup>3</sup>&#xa0;kg/s on 12 August to 6.7 × 10<sup>2</sup>&#xa0;kg/s on 14 August. Correspondingly, particle exit velocities decreased from a range of 4.7–37.7&#xa0;m/s on 12 August to 3.5–27.2&#xa0;m/s on 14 August. Maximum particle sizes decreased from − 12.7&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="445_2025_1834_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Phi\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (6.7&#xa0;m) to − 11.8&#xa0;<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="445_2025_1834_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Phi\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (3.6&#xa0;m) and median from − 10.7 <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="445_2025_1834_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Phi\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (1.7&#xa0;m) to − 9.7 <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="445_2025_1834_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Phi\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (0.83). The sustained yet pulsating activity suggests a complex interplay between coupled and decoupled gas–magma flows within the conduit, characteristic of unsteady Hawaiian-style eruptions. High-resolution video analysis proved valuable in capturing fine-scale eruptive dynamics often obscured in field deposits. By providing detailed measurements of eruption source parameters, this approach enhances understanding of explosive mafic volcanism and contributes to improved hazard assessment and risk mitigation strategies in volcanic regions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Quantifying explosive processes of the 2022 Meradalir eruption of the Fagradalsfjall Fires, Iceland

  • Caroline M. Tisdale,
  • Bruce F. Houghton,
  • Thorvaldur Thorsdarson,
  • Edward W. Llewellin,
  • Jóna S. Pálmadóttir

摘要

The 2022 Meradalir eruption at Fagradalsfjall, Iceland, provided an opportunity to study mildly explosive volcanic activity of a mafic volcano using video analysis. During a field campaign from 10 to 14 August 2022, we recorded high-resolution videos of explosive activity during the cone-building phase of the eruption. We analyzed 30-min intervals on two days with differing eruptive intensities—12 August (high intensity) and 14 August (low intensity)—to quantify particle exit velocities, particle size distributions, and mass eruption rates. Our results show significant variability in eruptive intensity on short (seconds to minutes) to long (hours to days) timescales. Instantaneous mass eruption rates fluctuated between 102 and 105 kg/s, with average rates decreasing from 5.5 × 103 kg/s on 12 August to 6.7 × 102 kg/s on 14 August. Correspondingly, particle exit velocities decreased from a range of 4.7–37.7 m/s on 12 August to 3.5–27.2 m/s on 14 August. Maximum particle sizes decreased from − 12.7  \(\Phi\) Φ (6.7 m) to − 11.8  \(\Phi\) Φ (3.6 m) and median from − 10.7 \(\Phi\) Φ (1.7 m) to − 9.7 \(\Phi\) Φ (0.83). The sustained yet pulsating activity suggests a complex interplay between coupled and decoupled gas–magma flows within the conduit, characteristic of unsteady Hawaiian-style eruptions. High-resolution video analysis proved valuable in capturing fine-scale eruptive dynamics often obscured in field deposits. By providing detailed measurements of eruption source parameters, this approach enhances understanding of explosive mafic volcanism and contributes to improved hazard assessment and risk mitigation strategies in volcanic regions.