<p>Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(G_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be an undirected finite graph on <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n\in {\mathbb {N}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> vertices labelled by <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\([n] = \{1,\ldots ,n\}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mo stretchy="false">{</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">}</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. For <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(i \in [n]\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, let <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta _{i,n}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be the <i>friendship bias</i> of vertex <i>i</i>, defined as the difference between the average degree of the neighbours of vertex <i>i</i> and the degree of vertex <i>i</i> itself when <i>i</i> is not isolated, and zero when <i>i</i> is isolated. Let <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu _n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denote the <i>friendship-bias empirical distribution</i>, i.e., the measure that puts mass <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\frac{1}{n}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mi>n</mi> </mfrac> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> at each <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta _{i,n}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(i \in [n]\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The friendship paradox says that <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\int _{\mathbb {R}}x\mu _n(\textrm{d}x) \ge 0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </msub> <mi>x</mi> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mtext>d</mtext> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≥</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, with equality if and only if in each connected component of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(G_n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> all the degrees are the same. We show that if <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((G_n)_{n\in {\mathbb {N}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msub> <mi>G</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">N</mi> </mrow> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is a sequence of sparse random graphs that converges to a rooted random tree in the sense of convergence locally in probability, then <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu _n\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>μ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> converges weakly to a limiting measure <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>μ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> that is expressible in terms of the law of the rooted random tree. We study <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>μ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for four classes of sparse random graphs: the homogeneous Erdős-Rényi random graph, the inhomogeneous Erdős-Rényi random graph, the configuration model and the preferential attachment model. In particular, we compute the first two moments of <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>μ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, identify the right tail of <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>μ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and argue that <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mu ([0,\infty ))\ge \tfrac{1}{2}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>μ</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>∞</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≥</mo> <mstyle displaystyle="false" scriptlevel="0"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, a property we refer to as <i>friendship paradox significance</i>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The friendship paradox for sparse random graphs

  • Rajat Subhra Hazra,
  • Frank den Hollander,
  • Azadeh Parvaneh

摘要

Let \(G_n\) G n be an undirected finite graph on \(n\in {\mathbb {N}}\) n N vertices labelled by \([n] = \{1,\ldots ,n\}\) [ n ] = { 1 , , n } . For \(i \in [n]\) i [ n ] , let \(\Delta _{i,n}\) Δ i , n be the friendship bias of vertex i, defined as the difference between the average degree of the neighbours of vertex i and the degree of vertex i itself when i is not isolated, and zero when i is isolated. Let \(\mu _n\) μ n denote the friendship-bias empirical distribution, i.e., the measure that puts mass \(\frac{1}{n}\) 1 n at each \(\Delta _{i,n}\) Δ i , n , \(i \in [n]\) i [ n ] . The friendship paradox says that \(\int _{\mathbb {R}}x\mu _n(\textrm{d}x) \ge 0\) R x μ n ( d x ) 0 , with equality if and only if in each connected component of \(G_n\) G n all the degrees are the same. We show that if \((G_n)_{n\in {\mathbb {N}}}\) ( G n ) n N is a sequence of sparse random graphs that converges to a rooted random tree in the sense of convergence locally in probability, then \(\mu _n\) μ n converges weakly to a limiting measure \(\mu \) μ that is expressible in terms of the law of the rooted random tree. We study \(\mu \) μ for four classes of sparse random graphs: the homogeneous Erdős-Rényi random graph, the inhomogeneous Erdős-Rényi random graph, the configuration model and the preferential attachment model. In particular, we compute the first two moments of \(\mu \) μ , identify the right tail of \(\mu \) μ , and argue that \(\mu ([0,\infty ))\ge \tfrac{1}{2}\) μ ( [ 0 , ) ) 1 2 , a property we refer to as friendship paradox significance.