<p>The purpose of this study is to systematically review human evidence linking placental hormones and IGF-1 with fetal growth, birth size, and early-life metabolic programming, and to identify disease-specific translational signals relevant to fetal growth restriction, metabolically complicated pregnancy, and extreme prematurity. A systematic review of PubMed and Scopus was performed for human studies published from January 2000 to March 2025. Eligible studies examined placental growth hormone, human placental lactogen, placental IGF-axis markers, or related stress-hormone pathways in relation to birth size, fetal or infant growth, or early metabolic outcomes. Reporting was aligned with PRISMA 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I principles for observational studies. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Thirty-seven included studies showed that mid-gestation placental growth hormone had the most consistent positive associations with fetal growth and birth size, whereas early placental growth hormone was less informative. Cord blood IGF-1 was the most reproducible endocrine correlate of birth length and weight. Reduced maternal or placental lactogen signals and lower placental 11β-HSD2 activity clustered with placental insufficiency and fetal growth restriction, while diabetic pregnancies showed a shift toward adiposity-related outcomes. In extreme prematurity, abrupt loss of placental endocrine support created a translational window in which rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 replacement emerged as the clearest mechanism-based intervention, although current clinical evidence remains preliminary.</p><p><i>Conclusion</i>:&#xa0;Placental endocrine markers should not be used as standalone screening tools. Their main value at present is mechanistic and translational: combined hormone patterns may refine biological understanding and risk stratification within defined maternal and neonatal disease frameworks, while IGF-1 replacement in extreme prematurity represents the most credible current therapeutic lead.<Table Float="No" ID="Taba"> <tgroup cols="2"> <colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" /> <colspec align="left" colname="c2" colnum="2" /> <tbody> <row> <entry align="left" nameend="c2" namest="c1"> <p><b>What is Known:</b></p> <p>• <i>Placental hormones and IGF-1 are linked with fetal growth, birth size, and neonatal metabolic adaptation, but 45 published evidence is heterogeneous and clinically fragmented.</i></p> <p><b>What is New:</b></p> <p>• <i>This systematic review organizes the human data within fetal growth restriction, diabetic/LGA pregnancy, and extreme prematurity frameworks and identifies translational signals—especially early IGF-1 replacement in extreme prematurity—rather than standalone diagnostic biomarkers.</i></p> </entry> </row> </tbody> </tgroup> </Table></p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Placental hormones, IGF-1, and early-life growth: endocrine links between birth size and infant metabolic programming—a systematic review

  • Ashraf T. Soliman,
  • Fawzia Alyafei,
  • Nada Alaaraj,
  • Shayma Ahmed,
  • Noor Hamed,
  • Sohair Elsiddig

摘要

The purpose of this study is to systematically review human evidence linking placental hormones and IGF-1 with fetal growth, birth size, and early-life metabolic programming, and to identify disease-specific translational signals relevant to fetal growth restriction, metabolically complicated pregnancy, and extreme prematurity. A systematic review of PubMed and Scopus was performed for human studies published from January 2000 to March 2025. Eligible studies examined placental growth hormone, human placental lactogen, placental IGF-axis markers, or related stress-hormone pathways in relation to birth size, fetal or infant growth, or early metabolic outcomes. Reporting was aligned with PRISMA 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I principles for observational studies. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively. Thirty-seven included studies showed that mid-gestation placental growth hormone had the most consistent positive associations with fetal growth and birth size, whereas early placental growth hormone was less informative. Cord blood IGF-1 was the most reproducible endocrine correlate of birth length and weight. Reduced maternal or placental lactogen signals and lower placental 11β-HSD2 activity clustered with placental insufficiency and fetal growth restriction, while diabetic pregnancies showed a shift toward adiposity-related outcomes. In extreme prematurity, abrupt loss of placental endocrine support created a translational window in which rhIGF-1/rhIGFBP-3 replacement emerged as the clearest mechanism-based intervention, although current clinical evidence remains preliminary.

Conclusion: Placental endocrine markers should not be used as standalone screening tools. Their main value at present is mechanistic and translational: combined hormone patterns may refine biological understanding and risk stratification within defined maternal and neonatal disease frameworks, while IGF-1 replacement in extreme prematurity represents the most credible current therapeutic lead.

What is Known:

Placental hormones and IGF-1 are linked with fetal growth, birth size, and neonatal metabolic adaptation, but 45 published evidence is heterogeneous and clinically fragmented.

What is New:

This systematic review organizes the human data within fetal growth restriction, diabetic/LGA pregnancy, and extreme prematurity frameworks and identifies translational signals—especially early IGF-1 replacement in extreme prematurity—rather than standalone diagnostic biomarkers.

Graphical Abstract