<p>Hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) is defined by the triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) and is caused, in 90% of pediatric cases, by Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC-HUS) infection. While targeting complement component C5 using eculizumab has shown benefit in atypical HUS, its effect on STEC-HUS, especially on neurological outcome, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of eculizumab on neurological prognosis in pediatric STEC-HUS. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024496489). A comprehensive literature search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, clinicaltrial.gov, and grey literature sources up to February 28, 2025. Original studies involving pediatric patients (0–18&#xa0;years) with STEC-HUS and neurological complications, treated with eculizumab, were eligible. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Seven studies were included, totaling 529 patients, of whom 135 (25.5%) developed neurological complications. Among these, 44 patients (32.5%) had received eculizumab. Meta-analysis showed a higher likelihood of receiving eculizumab therapy in patients with neurological involvement compared to those without (OR 13.03, 95% CI 4.40–38.75). However, in patients with neurological involvement, no clinical benefit was observed compared to those treated with standard therapies (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.09–1.22, <i>p</i> = 0.10). <i>Conclusion</i>: Our data did not demonstrate a significant improvement in neurological outcomes for STEC-HUS patients treated with eculizumab. Findings are limited by retrospective designs and potential confounding by indication; therefore, further studies are needed. <Table Float="No" ID="Taba"> <tgroup cols="1"> <colspec align="left" colname="c1" colnum="1" /> <tbody> <row> <entry align="left" colname="c1"> <p><b>What is Known</b>:</p> </entry> </row> <row> <entry align="left" colname="c1"> <p>• <i>Neurological involvement is a major contributor to morbidity in HUS, particularly in STEC-associated forms</i>.</p> </entry> </row> <row> <entry align="left" colname="c1"> <p>• <i>Eculizumab is sometimes used off-label in severe cases, although its effectiveness in this setting remains uncertain</i>.</p> </entry> </row> <row> <entry align="left" colname="c1"> <p><b>What is New</b>:</p> </entry> </row> <row> <entry align="left" colname="c1"> <p>• <i>This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis specifically addressing neurological prognosis in STEC-HUS</i>.</p> </entry> </row> <row> <entry align="left" colname="c1"> <p>• <i>Current evidence does not demonstrate a clear neurological benefit of eculizumab over standard therapy, highlighting the need for further studies</i>.</p> </entry> </row> </tbody> </tgroup> </Table></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Eculizumab in severe pediatric STEC-HUS and its impact on neurological prognosis—a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Rachele Spagnol,
  • Alessandra Alfisi,
  • Marco Moi,
  • Ilaria Bonvecchio,
  • Nicola Bertazza Partigiani,
  • Enrico Vidal

摘要

Hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) is defined by the triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) and is caused, in 90% of pediatric cases, by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC-HUS) infection. While targeting complement component C5 using eculizumab has shown benefit in atypical HUS, its effect on STEC-HUS, especially on neurological outcome, remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of eculizumab on neurological prognosis in pediatric STEC-HUS. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024496489). A comprehensive literature search was performed in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, clinicaltrial.gov, and grey literature sources up to February 28, 2025. Original studies involving pediatric patients (0–18 years) with STEC-HUS and neurological complications, treated with eculizumab, were eligible. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Seven studies were included, totaling 529 patients, of whom 135 (25.5%) developed neurological complications. Among these, 44 patients (32.5%) had received eculizumab. Meta-analysis showed a higher likelihood of receiving eculizumab therapy in patients with neurological involvement compared to those without (OR 13.03, 95% CI 4.40–38.75). However, in patients with neurological involvement, no clinical benefit was observed compared to those treated with standard therapies (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.09–1.22, p = 0.10). Conclusion: Our data did not demonstrate a significant improvement in neurological outcomes for STEC-HUS patients treated with eculizumab. Findings are limited by retrospective designs and potential confounding by indication; therefore, further studies are needed.

What is Known:

Neurological involvement is a major contributor to morbidity in HUS, particularly in STEC-associated forms.

Eculizumab is sometimes used off-label in severe cases, although its effectiveness in this setting remains uncertain.

What is New:

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis specifically addressing neurological prognosis in STEC-HUS.

Current evidence does not demonstrate a clear neurological benefit of eculizumab over standard therapy, highlighting the need for further studies.