An all-out sprint does not challenge the main goal of an endurance-based training session in cycling
摘要
This study investigated the acute and delayed effects of a prolonged, moderate-intensity training session with or without an interspersed all-out exercise on exercise capacity, physiological responses, and perceptual responses.
MethodsEighteen trained cyclists and triathletes (24.4 ± 2.6 years; 70.4 ± 8.5 kg;
Overall mechanical energy expenditure (Mec-EE) was significantly higher in INT (p < 0.001). Met-EE measured at 30-min intervals did not change over time (p = 0.166), and RER decreased significantly in both trials (p < 0.001), with no differences between CON and INT. RPE increased significantly over time (p < 0.001), with no differences between conditions (p = 0.272). At POST, while end-test power (EP) remained unchanged, total work done (TWD) and work above EP (WEP) significantly decreased (p < 0.001) with no differences between conditions. At REC, TWD and WEP were significantly higher than at POST (p < 0.01) and not different from PRE (p = 1.0), with no differences between conditions.
ConclusionA 3MAOT performed during an endurance-based training session did not alter metabolism or perceived exertion, nor did it affect delayed exercise capacity beyond the effect of the 3-h prolonged exercise itself. There appears to be no physiological basis for the strict exclusion of short, high-intensity bursts during endurance training.