Purpose <p>The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and applicability of the <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="421_2025_5845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{\text{V}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub> and heart rate (HR) kinetics during moderate-intensity cycling in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and healthy controls.</p> Methods <p>Patients receiving ICI therapy (<i>n</i> = 13, 46 ± 15 y, BMI = 24.3 ± 2.6) and age-matched controls (<i>n</i> = 13, 47 ± 18 y, BMI = 24.9 ± 4.5) completed all study procedures. Following medical clearance, they performed a ramp CPET on a cycle ergometer until task failure. During the second visit, they completed three consecutive step-transition tests: 6&#xa0;min at 20 W, followed by 6&#xa0;min at 90% of gas exchange threshold (GET), and continuing to 30-min constant-load cycling, with gas exchange and cardiovascular responses constantly monitored.</p> Results <p>The control group reached ~ 30% higher peak power output, resulting in higher peak values of minute ventilation (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="421_2025_5845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{\text{V}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation><sub>E</sub> by 23%), oxygen uptake (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="421_2025_5845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{\text{V}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub> by 33%), and carbon dioxide production (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="421_2025_5845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{\text{V}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>CO<sub>2,</sub> by 27%) compared to the ICI group. Similar HR max. and self-reported levels of perceived exertion (19 ± 1) were observed during CPET. The moderate-intensity τ<InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="421_2025_5845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{\text{V}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub> showed good-to-excellent reliability for both groups (the interclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.755 to 0.951), while the τHR had twofold higher coefficient of variation (CV%) in ICI patients compared to controls (24% vs 10%, p = 0.001). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed disproportional increase in HR during 30-min constant-load cycling in controls (14 ± 7&#xa0;bpm<sup>−1</sup>) and ICI patients (17 ± 9&#xa0;bpm<sup>−1</sup>), despite stabile <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="421_2025_5845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{\text{V}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>0<sub>2</sub> and PO.</p> Conclusions <p>Apparently, the <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="421_2025_5845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\dot{\text{V}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mover accent="true"> <mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo> </mover> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O₂ kinetics offer a more reliable alternative to HR responses when prescribing exercise for ICI patients. Significant intra-individual variability in τHR may indicate early cardiovascular deconditioning, highlighting the need for more comprehensive diagnostics.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Reliability and applicability of the \({\dot{\text{V}}}O_2\) and heart rate kinetics during moderate-intensity cycling in immunotherapy patients and healthy controls

  • Damir Zubac,
  • Timo Niels,
  • Freerk T. Baumann

摘要

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and applicability of the \({\dot{\text{V}}}\) V ˙ O2 and heart rate (HR) kinetics during moderate-intensity cycling in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and healthy controls.

Methods

Patients receiving ICI therapy (n = 13, 46 ± 15 y, BMI = 24.3 ± 2.6) and age-matched controls (n = 13, 47 ± 18 y, BMI = 24.9 ± 4.5) completed all study procedures. Following medical clearance, they performed a ramp CPET on a cycle ergometer until task failure. During the second visit, they completed three consecutive step-transition tests: 6 min at 20 W, followed by 6 min at 90% of gas exchange threshold (GET), and continuing to 30-min constant-load cycling, with gas exchange and cardiovascular responses constantly monitored.

Results

The control group reached ~ 30% higher peak power output, resulting in higher peak values of minute ventilation ( \({\dot{\text{V}}}\) V ˙ E by 23%), oxygen uptake ( \({\dot{\text{V}}}\) V ˙ O2 by 33%), and carbon dioxide production ( \({\dot{\text{V}}}\) V ˙ CO2, by 27%) compared to the ICI group. Similar HR max. and self-reported levels of perceived exertion (19 ± 1) were observed during CPET. The moderate-intensity τ \({\dot{\text{V}}}\) V ˙ O2 showed good-to-excellent reliability for both groups (the interclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.755 to 0.951), while the τHR had twofold higher coefficient of variation (CV%) in ICI patients compared to controls (24% vs 10%, p = 0.001). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed disproportional increase in HR during 30-min constant-load cycling in controls (14 ± 7 bpm−1) and ICI patients (17 ± 9 bpm−1), despite stabile \({\dot{\text{V}}}\) V ˙ 02 and PO.

Conclusions

Apparently, the \({\dot{\text{V}}}\) V ˙ O₂ kinetics offer a more reliable alternative to HR responses when prescribing exercise for ICI patients. Significant intra-individual variability in τHR may indicate early cardiovascular deconditioning, highlighting the need for more comprehensive diagnostics.