<p>Simply applying the directional derivative either twice to the strain-energy density function (hyperelasticity) or once to the stress–strain state (Cauchy elasticity) does not lead to the symmetries of the fourth-order elasticity tensor specified in the literature. Moreover, there are many justifications and arguments for the desired symmetries, which are summarized in this contribution. Thus, a symmetrization operator has to be introduced to guarantee minor symmetry, since the symmetry of the strain tensor is frequently neglected but is needed to obtain results required for particular elasticity relations. A thorough investigation is provided for both Cauchy elasticity and hyperelasticity, and what conclusion can be drawn on by various assumptions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A short note on minor and major symmetries in linear elasticity

  • Stefan Hartmann,
  • Alexander Düster

摘要

Simply applying the directional derivative either twice to the strain-energy density function (hyperelasticity) or once to the stress–strain state (Cauchy elasticity) does not lead to the symmetries of the fourth-order elasticity tensor specified in the literature. Moreover, there are many justifications and arguments for the desired symmetries, which are summarized in this contribution. Thus, a symmetrization operator has to be introduced to guarantee minor symmetry, since the symmetry of the strain tensor is frequently neglected but is needed to obtain results required for particular elasticity relations. A thorough investigation is provided for both Cauchy elasticity and hyperelasticity, and what conclusion can be drawn on by various assumptions.