Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To evaluate endophthalmitis rates following intravitreal injection of aflibercept, comparing between vial preparation and prefilled syringe use.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively collected data from ten ophthalmology departments in Israel. The number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections administered in years 2022 and 2023 was recorded. Endophthalmitis rates in 2022 (vial use) and in 2023 (prefilled syringe use) were compared. Clinical details of endophthalmitis cases were reviewed.</p> Results <p>In 2022, out of 119,904 intravitreal injections, 31,991 (27%) were aflibercept injections prepared from vials. In 2023, out of 128,306 intravitreal injections, 35,589 (28%) were aflibercept injections from prefilled syringes. Endophthalmitis rates were similar between vial preparation (1:1991) and prefilled syringe (1:2372) (<i>p</i> = 0.63). Notably, aflibercept injections exhibited significantly higher endophthalmitis rates compared to bevacizumab and ranibizumab combined, in both years (1:1999 vs. 1:5494 in 2022, and 1:2373 vs. 1:7132 in 2023, respectively; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01 for both).</p> Conclusion <p>Despite the transit to prefilled aflibercept syringes, endophthalmitis rates following aflibercept injection did not decrease. Post-injection endophthalmitis rates were significantly higher with aflibercept compared to bevacizumab and ranibizumab, with both vial and prefilled syringe.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Endophthalmitis rates following intravitreal injection of aflibercept using a prefilled syringe – a multicenter study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月29日

查看全文
  • Daniel David,
  • Dinah Zur,
  • Amit Biran,
  • Sharon Braudo,
  • Koby Brosh,
  • Elad Moisseiev,
  • Shiri Shulman,
  • Yoreh Barak,
  • Rita Ehrlich,
  • Shalev Fried,
  • Alon Peled,
  • David Hauser,
  • Tareq Jaouni,
  • Eran Pras,
  • Hagay Hayat,
  • Gabriel Katz

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate endophthalmitis rates following intravitreal injection of aflibercept, comparing between vial preparation and prefilled syringe use.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from ten ophthalmology departments in Israel. The number of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections administered in years 2022 and 2023 was recorded. Endophthalmitis rates in 2022 (vial use) and in 2023 (prefilled syringe use) were compared. Clinical details of endophthalmitis cases were reviewed.

Results

In 2022, out of 119,904 intravitreal injections, 31,991 (27%) were aflibercept injections prepared from vials. In 2023, out of 128,306 intravitreal injections, 35,589 (28%) were aflibercept injections from prefilled syringes. Endophthalmitis rates were similar between vial preparation (1:1991) and prefilled syringe (1:2372) (p = 0.63). Notably, aflibercept injections exhibited significantly higher endophthalmitis rates compared to bevacizumab and ranibizumab combined, in both years (1:1999 vs. 1:5494 in 2022, and 1:2373 vs. 1:7132 in 2023, respectively; p < 0.01 for both).

Conclusion

Despite the transit to prefilled aflibercept syringes, endophthalmitis rates following aflibercept injection did not decrease. Post-injection endophthalmitis rates were significantly higher with aflibercept compared to bevacizumab and ranibizumab, with both vial and prefilled syringe.