Purpose To investigate the feasibility of using binocular vision parameters as relatively objective indicators for screening asthenopia, thereby reducing reliance on subjective questionnaires. Methods 50 young Taiwanese adults (mean age: 28.60 ± 4.26 years) were recruited. All participants completed the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey Questionnaire (CISS-Q) and underwent binocular vision tests, including measurements of negative relative accommodation (NRA), positive relative accommodation (PRA), near point of accommodation (NPA), near point of convergence (NPC), and binocular accommodative facility (BAF). Participants were subsequently assigned into an asthenopia group (n = 26) and a non-asthenopia group (n = 24) based on their CISS-Q scores (post-hoc grouping). Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Parameters that showed significant differences were further analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the efficacy of binocular vision parameters for screening asthenopia. Results Significant differences were found between the asthenopia and non-asthenopia groups in binocular vision parameters, including NRA, PRA, NPC, and BAF (all p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis and Youden's index revealed that PRA demonstrated the highest screening efficacy (cut point: -2.25 D; sensitivity: 88.5%; specificity: 91.7%), followed by NPC (cut point: 2.25 cm; sensitivity: 84.6%; specificity: 75%) and NRA (cut point: + 1.88 D; sensitivity: 65.4%; specificity: 95.8%). Conclusion This study proposes the PRA cut point of -2.25D, which exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in asthenopia screening. With further validation, it may serve as a novel indicator in clinical practice. Key messages <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">What is known</Emphasis> <UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> Asthenopia is primarily assessed using subjective questionnaires, such as the Dry Eye Questionnaire, Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q), and Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey Questionnaire (CISS-Q), which may be limited by symptom specificity and subjective responses. </ItemContent> </UnorderedList> <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">What is new</Emphasis> <UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> Binocular vision parameters may have the potential as relatively objective indicators for screening asthenopia. </ItemContent> <ItemContent> This study proposes a PRA cut point of -2.25 D, which demonstrates high sensitivity (88.5%) and specificity (91.7%) for screening asthenopia, providing a novel clinical application. </ItemContent> <ItemContent> PRA is already a component of routine optometric examinations. It can be directly applied in clinical practice without requiring additional equipment or procedures. </ItemContent> </UnorderedList>

Evaluation of binocular vision parameters as screening indicators for asthenopia

期刊论文
发表日期：

2025年9月15日

查看全文

Guan-Cheng Lin,
Pei-Ru Huang,
Yueh-Jung Chen,
Kun-Shiang Chen

摘要

Purpose

To investigate the feasibility of using binocular vision parameters as relatively objective indicators for screening asthenopia, thereby reducing reliance on subjective questionnaires.

Methods

50 young Taiwanese adults (mean age: 28.60 ± 4.26 years) were recruited. All participants completed the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey Questionnaire (CISS-Q) and underwent binocular vision tests, including measurements of negative relative accommodation (NRA), positive relative accommodation (PRA), near point of accommodation (NPA), near point of convergence (NPC), and binocular accommodative facility (BAF). Participants were subsequently assigned into an asthenopia group (n = 26) and a non-asthenopia group (n = 24) based on their CISS-Q scores (post-hoc grouping). Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Parameters that showed significant differences were further analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the efficacy of binocular vision parameters for screening asthenopia.

Results

Significant differences were found between the asthenopia and non-asthenopia groups in binocular vision parameters, including NRA, PRA, NPC, and BAF (all p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis and Youden's index revealed that PRA demonstrated the highest screening efficacy (cut point: -2.25 D; sensitivity: 88.5%; specificity: 91.7%), followed by NPC (cut point: 2.25 cm; sensitivity: 84.6%; specificity: 75%) and NRA (cut point: + 1.88 D; sensitivity: 65.4%; specificity: 95.8%).

Conclusion

This study proposes the PRA cut point of -2.25D, which exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in asthenopia screening. With further validation, it may serve as a novel indicator in clinical practice.

Key messages

What is known

Asthenopia is primarily assessed using subjective questionnaires, such as the Dry Eye Questionnaire, Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q), and Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey Questionnaire (CISS-Q), which may be limited by symptom specificity and subjective responses.

What is new

Binocular vision parameters may have the potential as relatively objective indicators for screening asthenopia.

This study proposes a PRA cut point of -2.25 D, which demonstrates high sensitivity (88.5%) and specificity (91.7%) for screening asthenopia, providing a novel clinical application.

PRA is already a component of routine optometric examinations. It can be directly applied in clinical practice without requiring additional equipment or procedures.