Background Correct identification of those patients presenting with an acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) or an acute imbalance syndrome (AIS) that have underlying posterior-circulation stroke (PCS) and thus may benefit from revascularization (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), endovascular therapy (EVT)) is important. Treatment guidelines for AVS/AIS patients are lacking. We reviewed the evidence on acute treatment strategies in AVS/AIS focusing on predictors for IVT/EVT and outcome. Methods We performed a systematic search (MEDLINE, Embase) to identify studies reporting on acute treatment in PCS presenting as AVS/AIS (PROSPERO-registration = CRD42024537272). Key parameters were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed (Downs-and-Black quality assessment checklist). Results We identified 3883 citations and included seven study cohorts (n = 1000 patients including 950 ischemic strokes). Overall, 251/1000 patients (25.1%) received IVT; EVT was performed in 46/368 (12.5%). Acute vertigo/dizziness was reported in 295/1000 (29.5%) patients. AVS criteria were met in 186/407 (45.7%) patients evaluated, and AIS criteria in 82/346 (23.7%). IVT was reported in 71/195 (36.4%) AVS/AIS patients and EVT in 13/77 (16.9%) cases, whereas the door-to-needle time (DNT) was significantly longer for PCS compared to anterior-circulation stroke (90 ± 29min vs. 74 ± 30min, p = 0.003) in one study. DNT was similar in those patients presenting with AVS/AIS compared to all PCS presentations in another study (70 ± 39min (AVS/AIS) vs. 63 ± 35min (all)). An mRS <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="415_2024_12782_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\le$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>≤</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 2 after 90 days was noted in 68.4–69.6% of PCS. No outcome data were identified for AVS/AIS patients. Conclusions Insufficient data exist to drive any firm recommendation about treating otherwise eligible patients with AVS/AIS with IVT/EVT and judgments must be made on a case-by-case basis. Further research on this specific patient group is needed.

Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute dizziness or imbalance and suspected ischemic stroke-systematic review

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年1月3日

查看全文

Jonathan A. Edlow,
Alexander A. Tarnutzer

摘要

Background

Correct identification of those patients presenting with an acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) or an acute imbalance syndrome (AIS) that have underlying posterior-circulation stroke (PCS) and thus may benefit from revascularization (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), endovascular therapy (EVT)) is important. Treatment guidelines for AVS/AIS patients are lacking. We reviewed the evidence on acute treatment strategies in AVS/AIS focusing on predictors for IVT/EVT and outcome.

Methods

We performed a systematic search (MEDLINE, Embase) to identify studies reporting on acute treatment in PCS presenting as AVS/AIS (PROSPERO-registration = CRD42024537272). Key parameters were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed (Downs-and-Black quality assessment checklist).

Results

We identified 3883 citations and included seven study cohorts (n = 1000 patients including 950 ischemic strokes). Overall, 251/1000 patients (25.1%) received IVT; EVT was performed in 46/368 (12.5%). Acute vertigo/dizziness was reported in 295/1000 (29.5%) patients. AVS criteria were met in 186/407 (45.7%) patients evaluated, and AIS criteria in 82/346 (23.7%). IVT was reported in 71/195 (36.4%) AVS/AIS patients and EVT in 13/77 (16.9%) cases, whereas the door-to-needle time (DNT) was significantly longer for PCS compared to anterior-circulation stroke (90 ± 29min vs. 74 ± 30min, p = 0.003) in one study. DNT was similar in those patients presenting with AVS/AIS compared to all PCS presentations in another study (70 ± 39min (AVS/AIS) vs. 63 ± 35min (all)). An mRS $\le$ $\leq$ 2 after 90 days was noted in 68.4–69.6% of PCS. No outcome data were identified for AVS/AIS patients.

Conclusions

Insufficient data exist to drive any firm recommendation about treating otherwise eligible patients with AVS/AIS with IVT/EVT and judgments must be made on a case-by-case basis. Further research on this specific patient group is needed.