<p>Radiation quality for determining biological effects is commonly linked to the microdosimetric quantity lineal energy (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(y\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>y</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and to the dose-mean lineal energy (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). Calculations of <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are typically performed by specialised Monte Carlo track-structure (MCTS) codes, which can be time-intensive. Thus, microdosimetry-based analytic models are potentially useful for practical calculations. Analytic model calculations of proton <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and radiation protection quality factor (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Q\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>Q</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) values in sub-micron liquid water spheres (diameter 10–1000&#xa0;nm) over a broad energy range (1&#xa0;MeV–1&#xa0;GeV) are compared against MCTS simulations by PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA. Additionally, an improved analytic microdosimetry model is proposed. The original analytic model of Xapsos is refined and model parameters are updated based on Geant4-DNA physics model. Direct proton energy deposition is described by an alternative energy-loss straggling distribution and the contribution of secondary electrons is calculated using the dielectric formulation of the relativistic Born approximation. MCTS simulations of proton <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> values using the latest versions of the PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA are reported along with the Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) algorithm. The <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> datasets are then used within the Theory of Dual Radiation Action (TDRA) to illustrate variations in <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Q\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>Q</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with proton energy. By a careful selection of parameters, overall differences at the ~ 10% level between the proposed analytic model and the MCTS codes can be attained, significantly improving upon existing models. MCDS estimates of <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> are generally much lower than estimates from MCTS simulations. The differences of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Q\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>Q</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> among the examined methods are somewhat smaller than those of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Still, estimates of proton <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(Q\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>Q</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> values by the present model are in better agreement with MCTS-based estimates than the existing analytic models. An improved microdosimetry-based analytic model is presented for calculating proton <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="411_2025_1110_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="20" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({y}_{\text{D}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>y</mi> <mtext>D</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> values over a broad range of proton energies (1&#xa0;MeV–1&#xa0;GeV) and target sizes (10–1000&#xa0;nm) in very good agreement with state-of-the-art MCTS simulations. It is envisioned that the proposed model might be used as an alternative to CPU-intensive MCTS simulations and advance practical microdosimetry and quality factor calculations in medical, accelerator, and space radiation applications.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Analytic and Monte Carlo calculations of dose-mean lineal energy for 1 MeV–1 GeV protons with application to radiation protection quality factor

  • Alexis Papadopoulos,
  • Ioanna Kyriakou,
  • Yusuke Matsuya,
  • Miguel Antonio Cortés-Giraldo,
  • Miguel Galocha-Oliva,
  • Ianik Plante,
  • Robert D. Stewart,
  • Ngoc Hoang Tran,
  • Weibo Li,
  • Ioannis A. Daglis,
  • Giovanni Santin,
  • Petteri Nieminen,
  • Sebastien Incerti,
  • Dimitris Emfietzoglou

摘要

Radiation quality for determining biological effects is commonly linked to the microdosimetric quantity lineal energy ( \(y\) y ) and to the dose-mean lineal energy ( \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D ). Calculations of \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D are typically performed by specialised Monte Carlo track-structure (MCTS) codes, which can be time-intensive. Thus, microdosimetry-based analytic models are potentially useful for practical calculations. Analytic model calculations of proton \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D and radiation protection quality factor ( \(Q\) Q ) values in sub-micron liquid water spheres (diameter 10–1000 nm) over a broad energy range (1 MeV–1 GeV) are compared against MCTS simulations by PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA. Additionally, an improved analytic microdosimetry model is proposed. The original analytic model of Xapsos is refined and model parameters are updated based on Geant4-DNA physics model. Direct proton energy deposition is described by an alternative energy-loss straggling distribution and the contribution of secondary electrons is calculated using the dielectric formulation of the relativistic Born approximation. MCTS simulations of proton \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D values using the latest versions of the PHITS, RITRACKS, and Geant4-DNA are reported along with the Monte Carlo Damage Simulation (MCDS) algorithm. The \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D datasets are then used within the Theory of Dual Radiation Action (TDRA) to illustrate variations in \(Q\) Q with proton energy. By a careful selection of parameters, overall differences at the ~ 10% level between the proposed analytic model and the MCTS codes can be attained, significantly improving upon existing models. MCDS estimates of \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D are generally much lower than estimates from MCTS simulations. The differences of \(Q\) Q among the examined methods are somewhat smaller than those of \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D . Still, estimates of proton \(Q\) Q values by the present model are in better agreement with MCTS-based estimates than the existing analytic models. An improved microdosimetry-based analytic model is presented for calculating proton \({y}_{\text{D}}\) y D values over a broad range of proton energies (1 MeV–1 GeV) and target sizes (10–1000 nm) in very good agreement with state-of-the-art MCTS simulations. It is envisioned that the proposed model might be used as an alternative to CPU-intensive MCTS simulations and advance practical microdosimetry and quality factor calculations in medical, accelerator, and space radiation applications.