Background <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of concentrated growth factor (CGF) in type 1 tympanoplasty.</p> Methods <p>This study represents a retrospective analysis of a non-randomized interventional cohort study, included 60 patients who underwent primary type 1 tympanoplasty between November 2024 and July 2025. The patients were divided into those who received only a cartilage graft (<i>n</i> = 30) and those who received a cartilage graft and CGF (<i>n</i> = 30). The incidence rates of residual tympanic membrane perforation, audiological outcomes, and postoperative infection rates were compared.</p> Results <p>The incidence rate of residual perforation was significantly lower in the CGF group than in the cartilage-only group. The audiological outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. Postoperative infection was observed less frequently in the CGF group.</p> Conclusion <p>CGF may represent a promising adjunct in type 1 tympanoplasty by potentially supporting graft integration and reducing residual perforation rates.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The role of concentrated growth factor (CGF) in type 1 tympanoplasty

  • Belgin Tutar,
  • Güler Berkiten,
  • Cem Çelik,
  • Osman Doğan,
  • Seher Haksever Horat,
  • Fatma Gülüm Bayraktar,
  • Ceki Paltura,
  • Hüseyin Sarı,
  • Ziya Saltürk,
  • Yavuz Uyar

摘要

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of concentrated growth factor (CGF) in type 1 tympanoplasty.

Methods

This study represents a retrospective analysis of a non-randomized interventional cohort study, included 60 patients who underwent primary type 1 tympanoplasty between November 2024 and July 2025. The patients were divided into those who received only a cartilage graft (n = 30) and those who received a cartilage graft and CGF (n = 30). The incidence rates of residual tympanic membrane perforation, audiological outcomes, and postoperative infection rates were compared.

Results

The incidence rate of residual perforation was significantly lower in the CGF group than in the cartilage-only group. The audiological outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. Postoperative infection was observed less frequently in the CGF group.

Conclusion

CGF may represent a promising adjunct in type 1 tympanoplasty by potentially supporting graft integration and reducing residual perforation rates.