Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To evaluate the proof-of-concept feasibility of using low-cost, commercially available contact microphones (CMs) for bedside voice assessment under simulated hospital noise conditions.</p> Methods <p>Two low-cost CMs were tested against a reference accelerometer and headset air microphone using two vocally trained adults. Participants performed sustained vowels, pitch glides, and connected speech under four noise conditions: quiet-lab, quiet-hospital, multi-talker babble, and simulated hospital noise. The selected acoustic parameters, commonly used in clinical assessment, include smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), fundamental frequency (<i>f</i>o), shimmer, jitter, harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), noise-to-harmonics ratio (NHR), and low-to-high spectral ratio (L/H ratio). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.</p> Results <p>CPPS and <i>f</i>o demonstrated no significant device effects and remained stable across noise conditions (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Breathy voice significantly reduced CPPS (speech: β = − 0.48, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01; vowel: β = − 0.62, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01) and increased jitter and shimmer (β = 0.74 and 0.75, respectively; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). Device-related variability was most evident in shimmer and NHR, with accelerometer values differing from CMs. Noise conditions minimally influenced primary measures in CMs compared to the headset microphone.</p> Conclusion <p>This feasibility study suggests that low-cost CMs may preserve clinically relevant acoustic measures with stability across noisy conditions. Preliminary findings indicate potential advantages over conventional microphones for bedside voice assessment, though validation with clinical populations in real, rather than staged, conditions is needed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Low-cost contact microphones for bedside voice assessment: proof of concept

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月31日

查看全文
  • Adrián Castillo-Allendes,
  • Fernanda Figueroa-Martínez,
  • Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva,
  • Mark Berardi,
  • Eric J. Hunter

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate the proof-of-concept feasibility of using low-cost, commercially available contact microphones (CMs) for bedside voice assessment under simulated hospital noise conditions.

Methods

Two low-cost CMs were tested against a reference accelerometer and headset air microphone using two vocally trained adults. Participants performed sustained vowels, pitch glides, and connected speech under four noise conditions: quiet-lab, quiet-hospital, multi-talker babble, and simulated hospital noise. The selected acoustic parameters, commonly used in clinical assessment, include smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS), fundamental frequency (fo), shimmer, jitter, harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), noise-to-harmonics ratio (NHR), and low-to-high spectral ratio (L/H ratio). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.

Results

CPPS and fo demonstrated no significant device effects and remained stable across noise conditions (p > 0.05). Breathy voice significantly reduced CPPS (speech: β = − 0.48, p ≤ 0.01; vowel: β = − 0.62, p ≤ 0.01) and increased jitter and shimmer (β = 0.74 and 0.75, respectively; p ≤ 0.01). Device-related variability was most evident in shimmer and NHR, with accelerometer values differing from CMs. Noise conditions minimally influenced primary measures in CMs compared to the headset microphone.

Conclusion

This feasibility study suggests that low-cost CMs may preserve clinically relevant acoustic measures with stability across noisy conditions. Preliminary findings indicate potential advantages over conventional microphones for bedside voice assessment, though validation with clinical populations in real, rather than staged, conditions is needed.