Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To compare the oncological and functional outcomes of transorallaser microsurgery (TLM) and vertical partial laryngectomy (VPL) in earlystageglottic carcinoma (T1-T2).</p> Methods <p>A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines analyzedcomparative studies from 2000 to 2024 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web ofScience. Outcomes included local control, recurrence rates, larynxpreservation, survival, voice quality, and complications.</p> Results <p>Eight studies met inclusion criteria. TLM and VPL showed comparablesurvival rates for T1 tumors, but VPL provided better local control and larynxpreservation in T2 and anterior commissure involvement cases. TLM had higherrecurrence risk but superior functional outcomes, including better voicepreservation, shorter hospital stays, and lower complication rates.</p> Conclusion <p>Both techniques are viable, but TLM is preferred for T1 tumors,while VPL should be considered for T2 lesions because of higher local controlrates. Patient priorities and tumor characteristics should guide surgical choice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A systematic review on oncological outcomes, functional results, and laryngeal preservation in vertical partial laryngectomies vs. transoral laser microsurgery for early stage glottic cancer

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月3日

查看全文
  • Sara Bassani,
  • Rogerio Aparecido Dedivitis,
  • Gabriele Molteni,
  • Erica Zampieri,
  • Cecilia Dalmazzini,
  • Mario Augusto Ferrari de Castro,
  • Luiz Paulo Kowalski

摘要

Purpose

To compare the oncological and functional outcomes of transorallaser microsurgery (TLM) and vertical partial laryngectomy (VPL) in earlystageglottic carcinoma (T1-T2).

Methods

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines analyzedcomparative studies from 2000 to 2024 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web ofScience. Outcomes included local control, recurrence rates, larynxpreservation, survival, voice quality, and complications.

Results

Eight studies met inclusion criteria. TLM and VPL showed comparablesurvival rates for T1 tumors, but VPL provided better local control and larynxpreservation in T2 and anterior commissure involvement cases. TLM had higherrecurrence risk but superior functional outcomes, including better voicepreservation, shorter hospital stays, and lower complication rates.

Conclusion

Both techniques are viable, but TLM is preferred for T1 tumors,while VPL should be considered for T2 lesions because of higher local controlrates. Patient priorities and tumor characteristics should guide surgical choice.