Scholarlink

Introduction <p>This biomechanical study compared the fracture stability of a palmar plate combined with a headless compression screw (HCS) with that of a radiopalmar double-plate construct for AO/OTA 23-C2.1 distal radius fractures with metaphyseal defect zones.</p> Materials and Methods <p>Eleven matched pairs of cryopreserved human radii were prepared with standardized AO/OTA 23-C2.1 fractures. Left radii (n = 11) were fixed with a palmar plate plus HCS, while right radii (n = 11) received a radiopalmar double-plate construct. Construct stiffness and axial displacement were assessed using a universal testing machine. Interfragmentary range of motion (ROM) and rotation (ROT) were quantified using an optical three-dimensional motion-tracking system. Measurements were obtained before and after 5000 cycles of dynamic axial loading at 150 N. Two specimen pairs were excluded due to early failure or incomplete data acquisition.</p> Results <p>Both constructs demonstrated comparable stiffness and axial displacement, with no implant loosening or hardware failure observed. Interfragmentary ROM did not differ significantly between groups. However, the plate–HCS construct showed greater variability in rotational parameters. Initial radial-shaft rotation was significantly greater in the plate–HCS group (1.14° vs. 0.51°, p = 0.02). After cyclic loading, ulnar-shaft rotation increased significantly in the plate–HCS group (0.97° to 1.16°, p = 0.02) but not in the double-plate group.</p> Conclusion <p>In this cadaveric model, fixation with a palmar plate combined with an HCS provided comparable axial stability but demonstrated greater variability and less consistent rotational control compared with radiopalmar double plating. Clinical studies are required to determine whether this less invasive construct achieves equivalent outcomes in vivo.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Biomechanical comparison of palmar plate plus headless compression screw versus radiopalmar double plating in AO/OTA 23-C2.1 distal radius fractures

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月6日

查看全文
  • Patrick Riegner,
  • Christian Spiegel,
  • Felix Christian Kohler,
  • Heike Kielstein,
  • Ivan Zderic,
  • Boyko Gueorguiev-Rüegg,
  • Mark Lenz,
  • Wolfram Weschenfelder

摘要

Introduction

This biomechanical study compared the fracture stability of a palmar plate combined with a headless compression screw (HCS) with that of a radiopalmar double-plate construct for AO/OTA 23-C2.1 distal radius fractures with metaphyseal defect zones.

Materials and Methods

Eleven matched pairs of cryopreserved human radii were prepared with standardized AO/OTA 23-C2.1 fractures. Left radii (n = 11) were fixed with a palmar plate plus HCS, while right radii (n = 11) received a radiopalmar double-plate construct. Construct stiffness and axial displacement were assessed using a universal testing machine. Interfragmentary range of motion (ROM) and rotation (ROT) were quantified using an optical three-dimensional motion-tracking system. Measurements were obtained before and after 5000 cycles of dynamic axial loading at 150 N. Two specimen pairs were excluded due to early failure or incomplete data acquisition.

Results

Both constructs demonstrated comparable stiffness and axial displacement, with no implant loosening or hardware failure observed. Interfragmentary ROM did not differ significantly between groups. However, the plate–HCS construct showed greater variability in rotational parameters. Initial radial-shaft rotation was significantly greater in the plate–HCS group (1.14° vs. 0.51°, p = 0.02). After cyclic loading, ulnar-shaft rotation increased significantly in the plate–HCS group (0.97° to 1.16°, p = 0.02) but not in the double-plate group.

Conclusion

In this cadaveric model, fixation with a palmar plate combined with an HCS provided comparable axial stability but demonstrated greater variability and less consistent rotational control compared with radiopalmar double plating. Clinical studies are required to determine whether this less invasive construct achieves equivalent outcomes in vivo.