Scholarlink

<p>Shared decision making (SDM) is a&#xa0;structured process that integrates medical expertise and clinical indications with patients’ values, preferences and life goals. It is grounded in legal requirements for informed consent, ethical concepts of patient autonomy and a&#xa0;growing body of empirical evidence. This interdisciplinary consensus statement from German cardiovascular societies outlines the legal, ethical and practical foundations of SDM in cardiovascular medicine. Particular attention is given to preference clarification, informed consent and the challenges of implementing SDM in routine care. Decision aids are highlighted as standardized tools that support patient participation and facilitate communication about benefits, risks and treatment alternatives. International studies demonstrate that decision aids can improve patient knowledge, reduce decisional conflict and enhance active involvement in decision making. The paper presents the three-talks model as a&#xa0;practical framework for integrating decision aids into clinical pathways and provides recommendations for the quality-assured development and implementation in cardiovascular care. The participating societies regard SDM as a&#xa0;key component of high-quality, patient-centered cardiovascular medicine.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Entscheidungsfindung und Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Herzmedizin

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月28日

查看全文
  • Mark Weber-Krüger,
  • Moritz Blum,
  • Bernd Alt-Epping,
  • Marc Dittrich,
  • Franz Goss,
  • Tanja Henking,
  • Hashim Abdul-Khaliq,
  • Ingrid Kindermann,
  • Dorit Knappe,
  • Volker Köllner,
  • Gerald Neitzke,
  • Christian Perings,
  • Harald Rittger,
  • Jürgen in der Schmitten,
  • Daniel Schwittek,
  • Henrikje Stanze,
  • Klaus K. Witte,
  • Jochen Dutzmann

摘要

Shared decision making (SDM) is a structured process that integrates medical expertise and clinical indications with patients’ values, preferences and life goals. It is grounded in legal requirements for informed consent, ethical concepts of patient autonomy and a growing body of empirical evidence. This interdisciplinary consensus statement from German cardiovascular societies outlines the legal, ethical and practical foundations of SDM in cardiovascular medicine. Particular attention is given to preference clarification, informed consent and the challenges of implementing SDM in routine care. Decision aids are highlighted as standardized tools that support patient participation and facilitate communication about benefits, risks and treatment alternatives. International studies demonstrate that decision aids can improve patient knowledge, reduce decisional conflict and enhance active involvement in decision making. The paper presents the three-talks model as a practical framework for integrating decision aids into clinical pathways and provides recommendations for the quality-assured development and implementation in cardiovascular care. The participating societies regard SDM as a key component of high-quality, patient-centered cardiovascular medicine.