Background <p>Transradial approach (TRA) is widely accepted as a method of choice for coronary procedures. Modern puncture site haemostasis involves application of mechanical compression devices (MCD), using the patent haemostasis method with or without active dressing facilitation to avoid haematoma formation and radial artery occlusion. The Radial Artery Puncture Haemostasis Evaluation (RAPHE) study sought to determine whether the standalone use of two novel dressings, the 100% chitosan sponge and potassium ferrate disc, was non-inferior to the current gold standard pneumatic balloon MCD.</p> Methods <p>Six hundred patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to the three arms of the trial after a TRA procedure. The primary objective of the study was to assess the non-inferiority of the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), comprising radial artery occlusion or damage, as well as haematoma formation. Secondary outcomes encompassed haemostasis times affecting human resource management, as well as the number of utilized haemostasis devices and eventual bail-out requirements.</p> Results <p>Collected DOCE rates did not differ between the three groups, thus the chitosan and potassium ferrate dressings were non-inferior to the control MCD and each other. Secondary endpoints showed that both active dressings required fewer medical manipulations after application, thus alleviating staff, with potassium ferrate requiring marginally lower tourniquet times and the chitosan method requiring slightly more secondary devices and repeat tourniquets.</p> Conclusions <p>Our trial showed that standalone application of either dressing is equal in primary outcomes to the control MCD and may require less medical management to achieve similar results.</p> Trial registration <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04857385.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Simplified radial artery haemostasis: using non-compressive dressings—the Radial Artery Puncture Haemostasis Evaluation trial: results of the RAPHE trial

  • Péter Márton Kulyassa,
  • Balázs Tamás Németh,
  • Zoltán Ruzsa,
  • Tibor Szűk,
  • Réka Ehrenberger,
  • Brúnó Balázs,
  • Kornél Manó Kákonyi,
  • Dávid Becker,
  • Béla Péter Merkely,
  • István Ferenc Édes

摘要

Background

Transradial approach (TRA) is widely accepted as a method of choice for coronary procedures. Modern puncture site haemostasis involves application of mechanical compression devices (MCD), using the patent haemostasis method with or without active dressing facilitation to avoid haematoma formation and radial artery occlusion. The Radial Artery Puncture Haemostasis Evaluation (RAPHE) study sought to determine whether the standalone use of two novel dressings, the 100% chitosan sponge and potassium ferrate disc, was non-inferior to the current gold standard pneumatic balloon MCD.

Methods

Six hundred patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to the three arms of the trial after a TRA procedure. The primary objective of the study was to assess the non-inferiority of the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), comprising radial artery occlusion or damage, as well as haematoma formation. Secondary outcomes encompassed haemostasis times affecting human resource management, as well as the number of utilized haemostasis devices and eventual bail-out requirements.

Results

Collected DOCE rates did not differ between the three groups, thus the chitosan and potassium ferrate dressings were non-inferior to the control MCD and each other. Secondary endpoints showed that both active dressings required fewer medical manipulations after application, thus alleviating staff, with potassium ferrate requiring marginally lower tourniquet times and the chitosan method requiring slightly more secondary devices and repeat tourniquets.

Conclusions

Our trial showed that standalone application of either dressing is equal in primary outcomes to the control MCD and may require less medical management to achieve similar results.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04857385.

Graphical Abstract