Scholarlink

Aim <p>The role of drug-coated balloon (DCB)–only strategy in de novo chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. We compared DCB with drug-eluting stent (DES) strategies in patients undergoing CTO angioplasty.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively analyzed 170 patients with de novo CTO undergoing PCI between 2013 and 2019. Patients were treated with either DCB-only (<i>n</i> = 85) or DES-only (<i>n</i> = 85) strategies. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR); secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI), any MI, and a composite of all-cause mortality, MI, and TVR. Median follow-up was 3.67&#xa0;years.</p> Results <p>TVR occurred in 11 (12.9%) DCB vs. 5 (5.9%) DES patients (HR 2.33, 95% CI 0.81–6.74, <i>p</i> = 0.118). All-cause mortality (7.1% vs. 12.9%; HR 0.56, <i>p</i> = 0.262) and the composite endpoint (21.2% vs. 20.0%; HR 1.15, <i>p</i> = 0.686) did not differ significantly. After adjustment for creatinine, J-CTO score, and vessel diameter, outcomes remained comparable between groups. Creatinine was independently associated with mortality and the composite endpoint. No acute vessel closure or thrombosis occurred within 30&#xa0;days. During follow-up, no target lesion thrombosis was observed in the DCB group, while one late stent thrombosis (1.2%) occurred in the DES group.</p> Conclusion <p>In this single-center study, a DCB-only strategy for de novo CTO PCI demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to DES, supporting DCB as a potential alternative.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Long-term outcomes of drug-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents in coronary chronic total occlusion angioplasty: the SPARTAN-CTO study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月12日

查看全文
  • Rajkumar Natarajan,
  • Natasha Corballis,
  • Ioannis Merinopoulos,
  • Tharusha Gunawardena,
  • Upul Wickramarachchi,
  • Allan Clark,
  • Vassilios S. Vassiliou,
  • Simon C. Eccleshall,
  • Timothy Gilbert,
  • Johannes Reinhold,
  • Paul Richardson,
  • Alisdair Ryding,
  • Trevor Wistow,
  • Sulfi Sreekumar,
  • Chris Sawh,
  • Clint Maart

摘要

Aim

The role of drug-coated balloon (DCB)–only strategy in de novo chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. We compared DCB with drug-eluting stent (DES) strategies in patients undergoing CTO angioplasty.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 170 patients with de novo CTO undergoing PCI between 2013 and 2019. Patients were treated with either DCB-only (n = 85) or DES-only (n = 85) strategies. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR); secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI), any MI, and a composite of all-cause mortality, MI, and TVR. Median follow-up was 3.67 years.

Results

TVR occurred in 11 (12.9%) DCB vs. 5 (5.9%) DES patients (HR 2.33, 95% CI 0.81–6.74, p = 0.118). All-cause mortality (7.1% vs. 12.9%; HR 0.56, p = 0.262) and the composite endpoint (21.2% vs. 20.0%; HR 1.15, p = 0.686) did not differ significantly. After adjustment for creatinine, J-CTO score, and vessel diameter, outcomes remained comparable between groups. Creatinine was independently associated with mortality and the composite endpoint. No acute vessel closure or thrombosis occurred within 30 days. During follow-up, no target lesion thrombosis was observed in the DCB group, while one late stent thrombosis (1.2%) occurred in the DES group.

Conclusion

In this single-center study, a DCB-only strategy for de novo CTO PCI demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety outcomes comparable to DES, supporting DCB as a potential alternative.

Graphical Abstract