Consensus on discontinuation, refusal, and adherence to transanal irrigation in coloproctology: a national Delphi study in Spain
摘要
Transanal irrigation (TAI) is used in a range of functional digestive disorders; however, its clinical implementation remains notably heterogeneous. The absence of clear operational definitions for discontinuation, refusal, and adherence hampers the interpretation of outcomes and comparison across centres. The aim of this study was to reach a national consensus on these concepts through a structured Delphi process.
MethodsA national Delphi study was conducted following the RAND/UCLA methodology over two consecutive rounds. The questionnaire included 46 items distributed across four thematic sections and two exploratory parts. RAND/UCLA criteria were applied to determine appropriateness and degree of consensus, and items without consensus were reconsidered in the second round.
ResultsA total of 111 professionals with experience in TAI were invited to participate; 100 completed the first round and 91 the second. Of the 46 items, 24 (52.17%) reached consensus: 17 in the first round and 7 in the second. The strongest agreements were found around the differentiation between discontinuation and refusal, the behavioural definition of adherence, and the importance of initial information, systematic identification of discontinuation causes, and the need for structured follow-up programmes. Areas without consensus included logistical aspects, temporal criteria, and certain operational interventions, as well as professional profile–based discrepancies in specific items.
ConclusionsThis study provides consensus-based operational definitions and clinical criteria applicable to TAI practice in Spain. The agreements reached offer a solid foundation for standardising key concepts, improving outcome evaluation, and guiding the development of more consistent clinical guidelines and care pathways.