Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To identify preliminary efficacy signals of anticholinergics, alpha-1 blockers, and their combination on bladder and renal function in boys with bladder dysfunction following posterior urethral valve (PUV) ablation, and to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized, controlled trial.</p> Study design <p>In this single-center, prospective, randomized pilot trial boys under 12 years who had undergone cystoscopic valve ablation were randomized into three groups: anticholinergic therapy (Group I), alpha-1 blocker therapy (Group II), and combination therapy (Group III). The study was designed to detect within-group preliminary efficacy signals in urodynamic parameters following 6 months of pharmacotherapy. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient-reported symptom scores, renal function, and feasibility metrics. Between-group comparisons were performed as exploratory analyses. Feasibility and safety outcomes were analyzed in the intention-to-treat population, while efficacy analyses were conducted in participants who received intervention and had evaluable baseline and follow-up data.</p> Results <p>Thirty-five eligible patients were randomized (Group I, <i>n</i> = 12; Group II, <i>n</i> = 11; Group III, <i>n</i> = 12). and their clinical and biochemical analyses at baseline were recorded. Two deaths in Group II occurred prior to baseline urodynamics and pharmacotherapy initiation; efficacy analyses, therefore, included 33 patients (Group I, <i>n</i> = 12; Group II, <i>n</i> = 9; Group III, <i>n</i> = 12) with evaluable data. Urodynamic evaluation demonstrated favourable within-group trends: Group I showed a significant improvement in voided volume, while changes in voiding time, cystometric capacity (CC), static compliance, and maximum detrusor pressure (Pdetmax) were favourable but not uniformly statistically significant. Group II showed modest, favourable effects on Qmax, Time@Qmax, CC, and Pdetmax, with wide confidence intervals and no clear significant changes across most UDS measures. Group III demonstrated the most consistent favourable pattern, particularly for CC and Pdetmax, although most confidence intervals overlapped the null. Baseline-adjusted exploratory analyses did not demonstrate statistically significant between-group differences. Symptom scores improved across all groups. Feasibility outcomes were robust, with 81% recruitment, 91% urodynamic study completion, and 94% participant retention.</p> Conclusion <p>This pilot trial demonstrates the feasibility of conducting urodynamic-guided pharmacotherapy studies in young boys with PUV-related bladder dysfunction. The observed within-group efficacy signals across all treatment arms—particularly with combination therapy—are hypothesis-generating and provide effect size and variability estimates to inform the design of a definitive randomized controlled trial.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effect of anticholinergics vs. alpha-1 blockers vs. combination therapy on bladder function in patients with posterior urethral valve after transurethral fulguration: a pilot randomized controlled trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月11日

查看全文
  • Palak Singhai,
  • Muneer A. Malik,
  • Jai Kumar Mahajan

摘要

Purpose

To identify preliminary efficacy signals of anticholinergics, alpha-1 blockers, and their combination on bladder and renal function in boys with bladder dysfunction following posterior urethral valve (PUV) ablation, and to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized, controlled trial.

Study design

In this single-center, prospective, randomized pilot trial boys under 12 years who had undergone cystoscopic valve ablation were randomized into three groups: anticholinergic therapy (Group I), alpha-1 blocker therapy (Group II), and combination therapy (Group III). The study was designed to detect within-group preliminary efficacy signals in urodynamic parameters following 6 months of pharmacotherapy. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient-reported symptom scores, renal function, and feasibility metrics. Between-group comparisons were performed as exploratory analyses. Feasibility and safety outcomes were analyzed in the intention-to-treat population, while efficacy analyses were conducted in participants who received intervention and had evaluable baseline and follow-up data.

Results

Thirty-five eligible patients were randomized (Group I, n = 12; Group II, n = 11; Group III, n = 12). and their clinical and biochemical analyses at baseline were recorded. Two deaths in Group II occurred prior to baseline urodynamics and pharmacotherapy initiation; efficacy analyses, therefore, included 33 patients (Group I, n = 12; Group II, n = 9; Group III, n = 12) with evaluable data. Urodynamic evaluation demonstrated favourable within-group trends: Group I showed a significant improvement in voided volume, while changes in voiding time, cystometric capacity (CC), static compliance, and maximum detrusor pressure (Pdetmax) were favourable but not uniformly statistically significant. Group II showed modest, favourable effects on Qmax, Time@Qmax, CC, and Pdetmax, with wide confidence intervals and no clear significant changes across most UDS measures. Group III demonstrated the most consistent favourable pattern, particularly for CC and Pdetmax, although most confidence intervals overlapped the null. Baseline-adjusted exploratory analyses did not demonstrate statistically significant between-group differences. Symptom scores improved across all groups. Feasibility outcomes were robust, with 81% recruitment, 91% urodynamic study completion, and 94% participant retention.

Conclusion

This pilot trial demonstrates the feasibility of conducting urodynamic-guided pharmacotherapy studies in young boys with PUV-related bladder dysfunction. The observed within-group efficacy signals across all treatment arms—particularly with combination therapy—are hypothesis-generating and provide effect size and variability estimates to inform the design of a definitive randomized controlled trial.