<p>Experiments were carried out to investigate the jet characteristics in various spray modes of electrohydrodynamic spray. Through high-speed imaging, the jet morphology of different spray modes was observed and three distinct regimes were proposed: single cone-jet, meniscus multi-jet, and edge multi-jet. The operating domains of various jet regimes of electrohydrodynamic spray within a relatively wide range of flow rates and applied potentials were identified. In the cone-jet regime, both the jet breakup length and the cone semi-angle increase with the rise of the electro-Bond number <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EBo\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EBo</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and decrease with the increase of the electro-Weber number <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EWe\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EWe</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This behavior shares similarities with classical hydrodynamic sprays where the balance of inertial and capillary forces governs the jet characteristics. In the meniscus multi-jet regime, the liquid meniscus height grows with the increase of <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EBo\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EBo</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> but is nearly independent of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EWe\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EWe</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In the edge multi-jet regime, the jet breakup length decreases with the increase of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EBo\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EBo</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and is hardly affected by <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EWe\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EWe</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Meanwhile, the jet deviation angle is almost independent of both <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EBo\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EBo</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EWe\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EWe</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The jet breakup length varies linearly with <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EBo\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EBo</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, with fitting coefficients of 1.8 and -0.35 in the cone jet regime and the edge multi-jet regime respectively. The jet diameter increases with the increase of <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EWe\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EWe</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> but is almost independent of <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EBo\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EBo</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The results indicate that in the cone jet regime, the jet diameter increases with <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EWe\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EWe</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in a power law with a coefficient of 0.6, while in the edge multi-jet regime, the jet diameter increases linearly with <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(EWe\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">EWe</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> with a coefficient of 0.018. These findings confirm that the stable edge multi-jet structure is robust.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Jet characteristics in electrohydrodynamic spray: from single cone jet to multi-cone jets

  • Siyi Han,
  • Yuanping Huo,
  • Cong Zhang,
  • Qingming Dong,
  • Zhentao Wang,
  • Junfeng Wang

摘要

Experiments were carried out to investigate the jet characteristics in various spray modes of electrohydrodynamic spray. Through high-speed imaging, the jet morphology of different spray modes was observed and three distinct regimes were proposed: single cone-jet, meniscus multi-jet, and edge multi-jet. The operating domains of various jet regimes of electrohydrodynamic spray within a relatively wide range of flow rates and applied potentials were identified. In the cone-jet regime, both the jet breakup length and the cone semi-angle increase with the rise of the electro-Bond number \(EBo\) EBo and decrease with the increase of the electro-Weber number \(EWe\) EWe . This behavior shares similarities with classical hydrodynamic sprays where the balance of inertial and capillary forces governs the jet characteristics. In the meniscus multi-jet regime, the liquid meniscus height grows with the increase of \(EBo\) EBo but is nearly independent of \(EWe\) EWe . In the edge multi-jet regime, the jet breakup length decreases with the increase of \(EBo\) EBo and is hardly affected by \(EWe\) EWe . Meanwhile, the jet deviation angle is almost independent of both \(EBo\) EBo and \(EWe\) EWe . The jet breakup length varies linearly with \(EBo\) EBo , with fitting coefficients of 1.8 and -0.35 in the cone jet regime and the edge multi-jet regime respectively. The jet diameter increases with the increase of \(EWe\) EWe but is almost independent of \(EBo\) EBo . The results indicate that in the cone jet regime, the jet diameter increases with \(EWe\) EWe in a power law with a coefficient of 0.6, while in the edge multi-jet regime, the jet diameter increases linearly with \(EWe\) EWe with a coefficient of 0.018. These findings confirm that the stable edge multi-jet structure is robust.