Scholarlink

Objective <p>To compare the curative effect of 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope and 7. 5Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones &lt; 1. 5&#xa0;cm.</p> Materials and methods <p>From October 2024 to January 2025, 70 patients with &lt; 1. 5&#xa0;cm upper urinary tract calculi in our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups, 35 patients in Group 1 (6. 3Fr) were treated with 6. 3Fr HugeMed disposable electronic ureteroscopic laser lithotripsis. In the Group 2 (7. 5Fr), 35 cases were treated with 7. 5Fr common disposable electronic ureteroscope laser lithotripsis. The stone free rate, the success rate of the first stage operation, the operation time and the postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups.</p> Results <p>The operation time of Group 1 (6. 3Fr) was shorter than that of Group 2 (7. 5Fr), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.011). The success rate of the first stage operation was 100% in the Group 1 (6. 3Fr) and 91. 43% in the Group 2 (7. 5Fr), with no statistical significance (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in stone free rate, laser working time, hemoglobin decline on the first day after surgery, creatinine increase, postoperative hospitalization days and postoperative complications between the two groups (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05).</p> Conclusion <p>In conclusion, the sheathless technique using the 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope is safe and effective for upper urinary calculi &lt; 1. 5&#xa0;cm. Further investigations are warranted to evaluate its role in managing larger stones and other urological conditions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Efficacy of 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope versus 7. 5Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones < 1. 5 cm: a randomized controlled trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月23日

查看全文
  • Tianfu Ding,
  • Yangyang Xu,
  • Yang chen,
  • Bo Xiao,
  • Jianxing Li,
  • Li Jianxing

摘要

Objective

To compare the curative effect of 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope and 7. 5Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones < 1. 5 cm.

Materials and methods

From October 2024 to January 2025, 70 patients with < 1. 5 cm upper urinary tract calculi in our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups, 35 patients in Group 1 (6. 3Fr) were treated with 6. 3Fr HugeMed disposable electronic ureteroscopic laser lithotripsis. In the Group 2 (7. 5Fr), 35 cases were treated with 7. 5Fr common disposable electronic ureteroscope laser lithotripsis. The stone free rate, the success rate of the first stage operation, the operation time and the postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time of Group 1 (6. 3Fr) was shorter than that of Group 2 (7. 5Fr), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.011). The success rate of the first stage operation was 100% in the Group 1 (6. 3Fr) and 91. 43% in the Group 2 (7. 5Fr), with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in stone free rate, laser working time, hemoglobin decline on the first day after surgery, creatinine increase, postoperative hospitalization days and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the sheathless technique using the 6. 3Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscope is safe and effective for upper urinary calculi < 1. 5 cm. Further investigations are warranted to evaluate its role in managing larger stones and other urological conditions.