Scholarlink

Objectives <p>To investigate whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA) misses calcified plaques detected by thin-slice non-contrast CT (NCCT).</p> Materials and methods <p>This study included patients from two sites in the DISCHARGE trial for whom both 0.5 mm thin-slice NCCT and CCTA were available. Plaques on CCTA were defined as missed if they showed no spatial overlap with NCCT-detected plaques after deep learning-aided co-registration. Comparisons of plaque volume, density, and local coronary luminal attenuation between plaques missed and those detected by CCTA were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. In addition, the presence of these plaques on standard calcium scoring CT was assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland‒Altman analysis.</p> Results <p>This study included 45 patients (40% female, mean age 62 ± 11 years), in whom CCTA missed 37.6% of calcified plaques detected by NCCT (121/322). Missing calcified plaques on CCTA misclassified 8.9% of patients (4/45) as having no plaques. Compared with detected plaques, plaques missed by CCTA were both significantly smaller in volume (3.0 mm³ [IQR, 1.5–4.9] vs. 9.2 mm³ [IQR, 4.3–21.9], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and had lower density (212.7 HU [IQR, 174.5–242.4] vs. 292.7 HU [IQR, 243.2–361.3], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Only 44.0% of plaques (53/121) missed by CCTA were detected by standard calcium scoring CT. Interobserver analysis demonstrated excellent agreement for calcified plaque volume on CCTA (ICC = 0.91) and NCCT (ICC = 0.98).</p> Conclusion <p>CCTA missed more than one-third of coronary calcified plaques that are identifiable on co-registered thin-slice NCCT, which suggests an underutilized role of thin-slice NCCT in clinical practice.</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> Accurate detection of all coronary plaques is crucial for risk stratification. CCTA misses calcified plaques, which are detectable by thin-slice non-contrast CT (NCCT).</p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> CCTA misses over one-third of calcified plaques, nearly half of which are also missed by calcium scoring CT. NCCT detected these calcified plaques.</p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> Deep learning-aided registration enables multimodal CCTA–NCCT assessment, improving detection of calcified plaques overlooked by CCTA alone and providing more accurate plaque burden quantification that may support better clinical decision-making, which should be investigated in future studies.</p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Detection of calcified plaques: comparison between coronary CT angiography and thin-slice non-contrast CT with deep learning-aided image registration

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月20日

查看全文
  • Kenrick Schulze,
  • Federico Biavati,
  • Bernhard Föllmer,
  • Sotirios Tsogias,
  • Surenjav Chimed,
  • Hanna Balogh,
  • Norbert Nagy,
  • Ferhat Yavuz,
  • Anne-Marieke Stantien,
  • Renad-Heyam Abdelrahman,
  • Steffen Lukas,
  • Maria Bosserdt,
  • Marc Kachelrieß,
  • Wojciech Samek,
  • Marc Dewey

摘要

Objectives

To investigate whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA) misses calcified plaques detected by thin-slice non-contrast CT (NCCT).

Materials and methods

This study included patients from two sites in the DISCHARGE trial for whom both 0.5 mm thin-slice NCCT and CCTA were available. Plaques on CCTA were defined as missed if they showed no spatial overlap with NCCT-detected plaques after deep learning-aided co-registration. Comparisons of plaque volume, density, and local coronary luminal attenuation between plaques missed and those detected by CCTA were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. In addition, the presence of these plaques on standard calcium scoring CT was assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland‒Altman analysis.

Results

This study included 45 patients (40% female, mean age 62 ± 11 years), in whom CCTA missed 37.6% of calcified plaques detected by NCCT (121/322). Missing calcified plaques on CCTA misclassified 8.9% of patients (4/45) as having no plaques. Compared with detected plaques, plaques missed by CCTA were both significantly smaller in volume (3.0 mm³ [IQR, 1.5–4.9] vs. 9.2 mm³ [IQR, 4.3–21.9], p < 0.001) and had lower density (212.7 HU [IQR, 174.5–242.4] vs. 292.7 HU [IQR, 243.2–361.3], p < 0.001). Only 44.0% of plaques (53/121) missed by CCTA were detected by standard calcium scoring CT. Interobserver analysis demonstrated excellent agreement for calcified plaque volume on CCTA (ICC = 0.91) and NCCT (ICC = 0.98).

Conclusion

CCTA missed more than one-third of coronary calcified plaques that are identifiable on co-registered thin-slice NCCT, which suggests an underutilized role of thin-slice NCCT in clinical practice.

Key Points

Question Accurate detection of all coronary plaques is crucial for risk stratification. CCTA misses calcified plaques, which are detectable by thin-slice non-contrast CT (NCCT).

Findings CCTA misses over one-third of calcified plaques, nearly half of which are also missed by calcium scoring CT. NCCT detected these calcified plaques.

Clinical relevance Deep learning-aided registration enables multimodal CCTA–NCCT assessment, improving detection of calcified plaques overlooked by CCTA alone and providing more accurate plaque burden quantification that may support better clinical decision-making, which should be investigated in future studies.

Graphical Abstract