Objective Despite advances in mammography screening, some cancers remain undetected, prompting the evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) as an independent third reader to reduce missed cancers. Materials and methods In this prospective study, women eligible for the German Mammography Screening were enrolled at six sites belonging to one screening unit between August 2023 and February 2024. Each mammogram underwent double reading and was independently analyzed using Transpara, an AI-based detection software. Cases rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 by any reader or given a risk score of 10 by the software were reviewed in a consensus conference. Endpoints included: primary—cancer detection rate (CDR) and positive predictive values (PPV); secondary—analysis of cancers detected only by the software or missed by it. Results 15,356 female participants (mean age 58.6 ± 5.6 years) were included. Overall, 115 breast cancers were detected (CDR triple reading: 0.75%; 95% CI: 0.62%, 0.90%). CDR of double reading and standalone AI was 0.68% (95% CI: 0.56, 0.83%) and 0.66% (95% CI: 0.54, 0.81%). Using Transpara as a third reader increased the detection rate by 9.5% (95% CI: 4.7%, 16.8%) compared to double reading (p = 0.002). The PPV for consensus-conference referrals was 5.1% (95% CI: 4.2%, 6.1%), lower than double reading 7.5%(95% CI: 6.2%, 9.0%; p < 0.001). For recalled cases, the PPV was 13.7%(95% CI: 11.5%, 16.2%) versus 15.2% (95% CI: 12.6%, 18.1%; p < 0.001). All nine invasive cancers detected solely by AI were Luminal-A-like cancers. Among 13 cancers missed by the software, four were triple-negative. Conclusion Adding Transpara as an independent third reader improved detection rates, mainly by identifying additional Luminal-A-like cancers, and increased the workload to the consensus conference and the number of recalled cases. Key Points <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> Does the integration of AI software as an independent third reader improve cancer detection rates in mammography screening without increasing false-positive findings and recall rates? <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> AI as an independent third reader increased cancer detection by 9.5%, mainly identifying Luminal-A-like cancers, significantly decreasing the positive predictive values of cases referred to at the consensus conference and increasing the number of recalled cases. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> Using AI as an independent third reader enhances mammographic cancer detection by offering radiologists complementary sensitivity, especially for low-risk lesions. However, maintaining human readers is essential, as AI may miss aggressive subtypes like triple-negative breast cancers. Graphical Abstract

AI software as a third reader in breast cancer screening—a prospective diagnostic observational study

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年2月5日

查看全文

Thomas Lehnen,
Doris Polenske,
Barbara Daria Wichtmann,
Nils Christian Lehnen

摘要

Objective

Despite advances in mammography screening, some cancers remain undetected, prompting the evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) as an independent third reader to reduce missed cancers.

Materials and methods

In this prospective study, women eligible for the German Mammography Screening were enrolled at six sites belonging to one screening unit between August 2023 and February 2024. Each mammogram underwent double reading and was independently analyzed using Transpara, an AI-based detection software. Cases rated BI-RADS 4 or 5 by any reader or given a risk score of 10 by the software were reviewed in a consensus conference. Endpoints included: primary—cancer detection rate (CDR) and positive predictive values (PPV); secondary—analysis of cancers detected only by the software or missed by it.

Results

15,356 female participants (mean age 58.6 ± 5.6 years) were included. Overall, 115 breast cancers were detected (CDR triple reading: 0.75%; 95% CI: 0.62%, 0.90%). CDR of double reading and standalone AI was 0.68% (95% CI: 0.56, 0.83%) and 0.66% (95% CI: 0.54, 0.81%). Using Transpara as a third reader increased the detection rate by 9.5% (95% CI: 4.7%, 16.8%) compared to double reading (p = 0.002). The PPV for consensus-conference referrals was 5.1% (95% CI: 4.2%, 6.1%), lower than double reading 7.5%(95% CI: 6.2%, 9.0%; p < 0.001). For recalled cases, the PPV was 13.7%(95% CI: 11.5%, 16.2%) versus 15.2% (95% CI: 12.6%, 18.1%; p < 0.001). All nine invasive cancers detected solely by AI were Luminal-A-like cancers. Among 13 cancers missed by the software, four were triple-negative.

Conclusion

Adding Transpara as an independent third reader improved detection rates, mainly by identifying additional Luminal-A-like cancers, and increased the workload to the consensus conference and the number of recalled cases.

Key Points

Question Does the integration of AI software as an independent third reader improve cancer detection rates in mammography screening without increasing false-positive findings and recall rates?

Findings AI as an independent third reader increased cancer detection by 9.5%, mainly identifying Luminal-A-like cancers, significantly decreasing the positive predictive values of cases referred to at the consensus conference and increasing the number of recalled cases.

Clinical relevance Using AI as an independent third reader enhances mammographic cancer detection by offering radiologists complementary sensitivity, especially for low-risk lesions. However, maintaining human readers is essential, as AI may miss aggressive subtypes like triple-negative breast cancers.

Graphical Abstract