Scholarlink

Objectives <p>To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of a 3D FRACTURE (fast field echo resembling a CT using restricted echo-spacing) MRI sequence for the detection and classification of proximal tibial fractures compared with CT.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively included 126 patients (85 male; 39.6 ± 14.5 years) from two centers following acute knee injury. Patients underwent knee MRI at 3 T including FRACTURE-MRI. Additional CT was performed in patients with tibial fractures (32.5%; <i>n</i> = 41) as the reference standard for fracture classification. Two radiologists independently evaluated FRACTURE-MRI for the presence of fractures and classified them according to AO/OTA, Schatzker, and the 10-segment classification. Diagnostic performance of FRACTURE-MRI was assessed using crosstabulations. Inter-reader agreement was estimated using Krippendorff’s alpha. Image quality was graded on a five-point scale (5 = excellent; 1 = inadequate definition of fracture lines and fracture displacement) and assessed using estimated marginal means.</p> Results <p>Fractures were detected by FRACTURE-MRI with a sensitivity of 91.5% (83.2–96.5%) and a specificity of 97.1% (93.3–99.0%). Regarding fracture classification, diagnostic performances were slightly lower, with the 10-segment classification yielding the best sensitivity of 85.7% (81.4–89.3%) and specificity of 97.4% (96.6–98.0%), and the Schatzker classification yielding the lowest sensitivity of 78.2% (67.4–86.8%) and specificity of 97.7% (94.1–99.4%). Inter-reader agreement across the whole cohort was excellent (Krippendorff’s alpha 0.89–0.96) and when considering only patients with fractures, good to acceptable (0.48–0.91). Image quality was rated good (estimated marginal mean 4.3 (4.1–4.4)).</p> Conclusion <p>FRACTURE-MRI is feasible at 3 T enabling accurate delineation of fracture lines for precise diagnosis and classification of proximal tibial fractures.</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> <i>CT-like MRI is increasingly being evaluated for its advantages in bone imaging but is not yet established in routine practice</i>.</p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> <i>The 3D FRACTURE (fast field echo resembling a CT using restricted echo-spacing) MRI sequence is feasible at 3 T, allowing for diagnosis and classification of proximal tibial fractures</i>.</p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> <i>FRACTURE-MRI might be a helpful alternative to computed tomography in an acute trauma setting by reducing costs and radiation exposure in patients requiring a preoperative MRI anyway.</i></p> Graphical Abstract <p></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Assessment of proximal tibial fractures with 3D FRACTURE (fast field echo resembling a CT using restricted echo-spacing) MRI—intra-individual comparison with CT

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月24日

查看全文
  • Inka Ristow,
  • Shuo Zhang,
  • Christoph Riedel,
  • Alexander Lenz,
  • Ralph Akoto,
  • Matthias Krause,
  • Gerhard Adam,
  • Peter Bannas,
  • Frank Oliver Henes,
  • Lennart Well

摘要

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of a 3D FRACTURE (fast field echo resembling a CT using restricted echo-spacing) MRI sequence for the detection and classification of proximal tibial fractures compared with CT.

Methods

We retrospectively included 126 patients (85 male; 39.6 ± 14.5 years) from two centers following acute knee injury. Patients underwent knee MRI at 3 T including FRACTURE-MRI. Additional CT was performed in patients with tibial fractures (32.5%; n = 41) as the reference standard for fracture classification. Two radiologists independently evaluated FRACTURE-MRI for the presence of fractures and classified them according to AO/OTA, Schatzker, and the 10-segment classification. Diagnostic performance of FRACTURE-MRI was assessed using crosstabulations. Inter-reader agreement was estimated using Krippendorff’s alpha. Image quality was graded on a five-point scale (5 = excellent; 1 = inadequate definition of fracture lines and fracture displacement) and assessed using estimated marginal means.

Results

Fractures were detected by FRACTURE-MRI with a sensitivity of 91.5% (83.2–96.5%) and a specificity of 97.1% (93.3–99.0%). Regarding fracture classification, diagnostic performances were slightly lower, with the 10-segment classification yielding the best sensitivity of 85.7% (81.4–89.3%) and specificity of 97.4% (96.6–98.0%), and the Schatzker classification yielding the lowest sensitivity of 78.2% (67.4–86.8%) and specificity of 97.7% (94.1–99.4%). Inter-reader agreement across the whole cohort was excellent (Krippendorff’s alpha 0.89–0.96) and when considering only patients with fractures, good to acceptable (0.48–0.91). Image quality was rated good (estimated marginal mean 4.3 (4.1–4.4)).

Conclusion

FRACTURE-MRI is feasible at 3 T enabling accurate delineation of fracture lines for precise diagnosis and classification of proximal tibial fractures.

Key Points

Question CT-like MRI is increasingly being evaluated for its advantages in bone imaging but is not yet established in routine practice.

Findings The 3D FRACTURE (fast field echo resembling a CT using restricted echo-spacing) MRI sequence is feasible at 3 T, allowing for diagnosis and classification of proximal tibial fractures.

Clinical relevance FRACTURE-MRI might be a helpful alternative to computed tomography in an acute trauma setting by reducing costs and radiation exposure in patients requiring a preoperative MRI anyway.

Graphical Abstract