Objectives <p>To assess the prognostic value of Fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, gallium 68-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor-04 [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, <sup>11</sup>C-acetate in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluate the potential usefulness and advantages of different combinations for accurate diagnosis.</p> Materials and methods <p>Thirty-six patients with suspected hepatic masses were prospectively enrolled from May 2021 to September 2022 and underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, and <sup>11</sup>C-acetate PET/CT scans before surgery. PET/CT results and histopathologic examinations were independently interpreted by two radiologists and pathologists, respectively. Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves were calculated and the sensitivity among [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, <sup>11</sup>C-acetate, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, and different combinations were compared.</p> Results <p>Of the 36 included patients (mean age, 59 years ± 10 (standard deviation)), 29 were diagnosed with HCC, four with non-HCC malignant tumors, and three with benign tumors. Patients with HCC lesions negative for <sup>11</sup>C-acetate or [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 exhibited poorer overall survival. Out of 36 patients, 44 HCC lesions were detected. The dual-tracer [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/<sup>11</sup>C-acetate exhibited the highest sensitivity (39 of 44 lesions (88.6%)) among all schemes. HCC lesions with higher histological grade and microvascular invasion (MVI) showed higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, but no evidence of significant differences was found in [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and <sup>11</sup>C-acetate PET/CT. Higher expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) showed higher uptake of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG.</p> Conclusion <p>[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and <sup>11</sup>C-acetate PET/CT exhibited good predictive value for HCC patients, with their combination showing the highest sensitivity for HCC detection, suggesting potential for improved diagnostic protocols.</p> Key Points <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> <i>What are the prognostic and diagnostic values of PET/CT tracers, including</i> [<sup><i>18</i></sup><i>F]FDG</i>, [<sup><i>68</i></sup><i>Ga]FAPI-04, and</i> <sup><i>11</i></sup><i>C-acetate?</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> <i>Hepatocellular carcinoma, with differing findings across</i> [<sup><i>18</i></sup><i>F]FDG,</i> [<sup><i>68</i></sup><i>Ga]GaFAPI-04, and</i> <sup><i>11</i></sup><i>C-acetate PET/CT, showed varied prognoses</i>; [<sup><i>68</i></sup><i>Ga]GaFAPI-04 and</i> <sup><i>11</i></sup><i>C-acetate combined offered the highest detection sensitivity.</i></p> <p><Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> <i>Evaluating the prognostic value and diagnostic efficacy of different tracer combinations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma helps to guide the optimal selection of tracers in clinical practice.</i></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Prognostic and diagnostic value of [18F]FDG, 11C-acetate, and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Hao Xu,
  • Hao Wang,
  • Shi-zhe Yu,
  • Xiu-ming Li,
  • Dong-lang Jiang,
  • Yan-fei Wu,
  • Shu-hua Ren,
  • Lun-xiu Qin,
  • Yi-hui Guan,
  • Lu Lu,
  • Wen-wei Zhu,
  • Xiao-yang Wang,
  • Fang Xie

摘要

Objectives

To assess the prognostic value of Fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose [18F]FDG, gallium 68-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor-04 [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, 11C-acetate in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and evaluate the potential usefulness and advantages of different combinations for accurate diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Thirty-six patients with suspected hepatic masses were prospectively enrolled from May 2021 to September 2022 and underwent [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, and 11C-acetate PET/CT scans before surgery. PET/CT results and histopathologic examinations were independently interpreted by two radiologists and pathologists, respectively. Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves were calculated and the sensitivity among [18F]FDG, 11C-acetate, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, and different combinations were compared.

Results

Of the 36 included patients (mean age, 59 years ± 10 (standard deviation)), 29 were diagnosed with HCC, four with non-HCC malignant tumors, and three with benign tumors. Patients with HCC lesions negative for 11C-acetate or [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 exhibited poorer overall survival. Out of 36 patients, 44 HCC lesions were detected. The dual-tracer [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/11C-acetate exhibited the highest sensitivity (39 of 44 lesions (88.6%)) among all schemes. HCC lesions with higher histological grade and microvascular invasion (MVI) showed higher maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of [18F]FDG, but no evidence of significant differences was found in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and 11C-acetate PET/CT. Higher expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) showed higher uptake of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG.

Conclusion

[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and 11C-acetate PET/CT exhibited good predictive value for HCC patients, with their combination showing the highest sensitivity for HCC detection, suggesting potential for improved diagnostic protocols.

Key Points

Question What are the prognostic and diagnostic values of PET/CT tracers, including [18F]FDG, [68Ga]FAPI-04, and 11C-acetate?

Findings Hepatocellular carcinoma, with differing findings across [18F]FDG, [68Ga]GaFAPI-04, and 11C-acetate PET/CT, showed varied prognoses; [68Ga]GaFAPI-04 and 11C-acetate combined offered the highest detection sensitivity.

Clinical relevance Evaluating the prognostic value and diagnostic efficacy of different tracer combinations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma helps to guide the optimal selection of tracers in clinical practice.