Multicenter study of thermal ablation versus partial thyroidectomy for paratracheal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
摘要
To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with unifocal paratracheal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) after thermal ablation (TA) vs. partial thyroidectomy (PT).
Materials and methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 436 patients with unifocal, clinical N0 paratracheal PTMC who underwent TA (210 patients) or PT (236 patients) between June 2014 and December 2020. The propensity score matching method was used to mitigate confounding factors between the two groups. Disease progression, progression-free survival (PFS), complications, and treatment variables were compared. Adjusted Cox regression models were utilized to assess the impact of treatment on disease progression.
ResultsAfter matching, a comparable incidence of disease progression (3.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.79) and comparable 5-year PFS rates (97.0% vs. 97.4%, p = 0.75) were observed between the TA and PT groups. Adjusted Cox regression models showed no significant correlation between TA and disease progression. TA was associated with shorter hospitalization (0 vs. 6.0 days), less estimated blood loss (0 vs. 15.0 mL), shorter incision length (0.3 vs. 6.0 cm), and lower costs ($1748.3 vs. $2898.0) compared with PT (all p < 0.001). The complication rate was 1.1% after TA and 3.3% after PT (p = 0.28), with permanent complications were exclusively observed in the PT group.
ConclusionThe mid-term incidence of disease progression and PFS rates were similar between TA and PT in patients with unifocal paratracheal PTMC. TA might represent a promising alternative treatment to PT for eligible patients with paratracheal PTMC.
Key Points