Objective To compare the clinical outcomes between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) in a large cohort. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 1111 patients with solitary T1N0M0 PTC treated with RFA (n = 894) or MWA (n = 215) by experienced physicians. A propensity score matching was used to compare disease progression, including lymph node metastases (LNM), recurrent tumors and persistent tumors, recurrence-free survival (RFS), volume reduction ratio (VRR), and complications between the RFA and MWA groups. The subgroup outcomes of T1a and T1b tumors treated with RFA and MWA were also compared. Results During a mean follow-up period of 41.7 ± 12.6 months, the overall incidence rates of disease progression, LNM, recurrent tumors, and persistent tumors were 2.1%, 0.7%, 1.2%, and 0.2%, respectively. Eight patients (0.7%) experienced transient voice change and recovered within 3 months. After 1:1 matching, there were no significant differences in disease progression (3.3% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.793), LNM (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000), recurrent tumor (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000), persistent tumors (0.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.317), RFS rates (96.7% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.821), VRR (99.3 ± 3.0% vs. 98.3 ± 8.5%, p = 0.865), tumor disappearance rate (87.9% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.061) and complications (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000) between the RFA and MWA groups. For T1a and T1b tumors, clinical outcomes were comparable between RFA and MWA. Conclusions RFA and MWA did not show significant differences in clinical outcomes for T1N0M0 PTC. The choice between RFA and MWA could depend on physician expertise and resources of local center resources. A qualified and experienced physician with extensive knowledge of the modalities is recommended when thermal ablation is performed. Key Points <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Question</Emphasis> With radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) used worldwide for T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), is one of them superior to the others? <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Findings</Emphasis> There were no significant differences in disease progression, recurrence-free survival, volume reduction ratio, tumor disappearance, or complications between techniques for solitary T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">Clinical relevance</Emphasis> The choice between RFA and MWA could depend on physician expertise and resources of the local center resources. A qualified and experienced physician with extensive knowledge of the modalities is recommended when thermal ablation is performed.

Comparative outcomes of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation vs. microwave ablation for patients with T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

期刊论文
发表日期：

2025年1月21日

查看全文

Lin Yan,
Zhen Yang,
Haoyu Jing,
Jing Xiao,
Yingying Li,
XinYang Li,
Mingbo Zhang,
Yukun Luo

摘要

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) in a large cohort.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 1111 patients with solitary T1N0M0 PTC treated with RFA (n = 894) or MWA (n = 215) by experienced physicians. A propensity score matching was used to compare disease progression, including lymph node metastases (LNM), recurrent tumors and persistent tumors, recurrence-free survival (RFS), volume reduction ratio (VRR), and complications between the RFA and MWA groups. The subgroup outcomes of T1a and T1b tumors treated with RFA and MWA were also compared.

Results

During a mean follow-up period of 41.7 ± 12.6 months, the overall incidence rates of disease progression, LNM, recurrent tumors, and persistent tumors were 2.1%, 0.7%, 1.2%, and 0.2%, respectively. Eight patients (0.7%) experienced transient voice change and recovered within 3 months. After 1:1 matching, there were no significant differences in disease progression (3.3% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.793), LNM (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000), recurrent tumor (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000), persistent tumors (0.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.317), RFS rates (96.7% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.821), VRR (99.3 ± 3.0% vs. 98.3 ± 8.5%, p = 0.865), tumor disappearance rate (87.9% vs. 81.4%, p = 0.061) and complications (1.4% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000) between the RFA and MWA groups. For T1a and T1b tumors, clinical outcomes were comparable between RFA and MWA.

Conclusions

RFA and MWA did not show significant differences in clinical outcomes for T1N0M0 PTC. The choice between RFA and MWA could depend on physician expertise and resources of local center resources. A qualified and experienced physician with extensive knowledge of the modalities is recommended when thermal ablation is performed.

Key Points

Question With radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) used worldwide for T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), is one of them superior to the others?

Findings There were no significant differences in disease progression, recurrence-free survival, volume reduction ratio, tumor disappearance, or complications between techniques for solitary T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Clinical relevance The choice between RFA and MWA could depend on physician expertise and resources of the local center resources. A qualified and experienced physician with extensive knowledge of the modalities is recommended when thermal ablation is performed.