Background <p>Oral azacitidine improves survival in patients with AML in first complete remission who are not candidates for allogeneic transplantation. Most favorable-risk AML patients harbor molecular markers enabling sensitive measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. While MRD is a well-established prognostic factor in AML, the clinical significance of MRD dynamics during maintenance therapy remains incompletely defined.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a multicenter, real-world retrospective study of 30 patients with AML, predominantly ELN favorable-risk, treated with oral azacitidine maintenance following intensive induction-consolidation. MRD was assessed longitudinally using standardized molecular and flow-based assays. Outcomes were analyzed according to MRD status at maintenance initiation and subsequent MRD conversion.</p> Results <p>At initiation of oral azacitidine, 47% of patients were MRD-positive. MRD conversion to negativity occurred in 64% of these patients during maintenance. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was comparable between patients who were MRD-negative at baseline and those who converted to MRD negativity (24-months restricted median RFS 577 vs. 638&#xa0;days), whereas patients with persistent MRD positivity experienced early relapse (24-months restricted median RFS 63&#xa0;days). Despite inferior RFS, overall survival did not significantly differ between MRD-defined groups. Patients relapsing after oral azacitidine retained sensitivity to subsequent therapies, including venetoclax–azacitidine–based regimens, with high rates of molecular response.</p> Conclusions <p>Oral azacitidine was associated with high rates of MRD conversion, conferring RFS comparable to patients who were MRD-negative at treatment initiation. Persistent MRD identified patients at high-risk for early relapse, while effective salvage therapies mitigated overall survival differences. These findings support prospective evaluation of MRD-guided maintenance strategies in favorable-risk AML but should be considered hypothesis-generating given the retrospective design and limited cohort size. The trial is on behalf of the Israel Acute Leukemia Group.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

MRD conversion during oral azacitidine maintenance correlates with outcomes in predominantly favorable-risk AML

  • Noa Hurvitz,
  • Irina Amitai,
  • Ilana Levy Yurkovski,
  • Ariella Tvito,
  • Yishai Ofran,
  • Tzvika Porges,
  • Ofir Wolach,
  • Adi Sherban,
  • Noa Gross Even-Zohar,
  • Vladimir Vainstein,
  • Arnon Haran,
  • Shlomzion Aumann,
  • Robert Mikhelashvili,
  • Avraham Frisch,
  • Boaz Nachmias

摘要

Background

Oral azacitidine improves survival in patients with AML in first complete remission who are not candidates for allogeneic transplantation. Most favorable-risk AML patients harbor molecular markers enabling sensitive measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. While MRD is a well-established prognostic factor in AML, the clinical significance of MRD dynamics during maintenance therapy remains incompletely defined.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, real-world retrospective study of 30 patients with AML, predominantly ELN favorable-risk, treated with oral azacitidine maintenance following intensive induction-consolidation. MRD was assessed longitudinally using standardized molecular and flow-based assays. Outcomes were analyzed according to MRD status at maintenance initiation and subsequent MRD conversion.

Results

At initiation of oral azacitidine, 47% of patients were MRD-positive. MRD conversion to negativity occurred in 64% of these patients during maintenance. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was comparable between patients who were MRD-negative at baseline and those who converted to MRD negativity (24-months restricted median RFS 577 vs. 638 days), whereas patients with persistent MRD positivity experienced early relapse (24-months restricted median RFS 63 days). Despite inferior RFS, overall survival did not significantly differ between MRD-defined groups. Patients relapsing after oral azacitidine retained sensitivity to subsequent therapies, including venetoclax–azacitidine–based regimens, with high rates of molecular response.

Conclusions

Oral azacitidine was associated with high rates of MRD conversion, conferring RFS comparable to patients who were MRD-negative at treatment initiation. Persistent MRD identified patients at high-risk for early relapse, while effective salvage therapies mitigated overall survival differences. These findings support prospective evaluation of MRD-guided maintenance strategies in favorable-risk AML but should be considered hypothesis-generating given the retrospective design and limited cohort size. The trial is on behalf of the Israel Acute Leukemia Group.