Purpose <p>To document an extracranial fenestration of the mastoid emissary vein (MEV) and to clarify its drainage pattern and potential procedural relevance.</p> Methods <p>A 46-year-old male underwent multidetector CT angiographic evaluation of the cervical carotid system. DICOM data were post-processed in Horos using multiplanar reconstructions and three-dimensional volume-rendered images; morphometric measurements were obtained on the reconstructions.</p> Results <p>A large left MEV (6.6&#xa0;mm) exited through a single mastoid foramen situated 2.95&#xa0;cm postero-supero-medially to the mastoid tip. The vein divided 2.2&#xa0;mm distal to the foramen into an anterior limb (5.0&#xa0;mm) and a posterior limb (1.1&#xa0;mm) that rejoined 2.33&#xa0;cm inferiorly, forming a long fenestration. Three deep communicating veins connected the fenestrated segment to the suboccipital venous plexus, and the distal MEV continued as the deep cervical vein.</p> Conclusion <p>Extracranial fenestration is a plausible variant of a prominent MEV. Recognition on CT may prevent misinterpretation as vascular duplication or pathology and may influence mastoid, retrosigmoid, and endovascular planning in the mastoid–suboccipital region.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Fenestrated giant mastoid emissary vein, a novel finding

  • Mugurel Constantin Rusu,
  • Răzvan Costin Tudose,
  • Alexandra Diana Vrapciu

摘要

Purpose

To document an extracranial fenestration of the mastoid emissary vein (MEV) and to clarify its drainage pattern and potential procedural relevance.

Methods

A 46-year-old male underwent multidetector CT angiographic evaluation of the cervical carotid system. DICOM data were post-processed in Horos using multiplanar reconstructions and three-dimensional volume-rendered images; morphometric measurements were obtained on the reconstructions.

Results

A large left MEV (6.6 mm) exited through a single mastoid foramen situated 2.95 cm postero-supero-medially to the mastoid tip. The vein divided 2.2 mm distal to the foramen into an anterior limb (5.0 mm) and a posterior limb (1.1 mm) that rejoined 2.33 cm inferiorly, forming a long fenestration. Three deep communicating veins connected the fenestrated segment to the suboccipital venous plexus, and the distal MEV continued as the deep cervical vein.

Conclusion

Extracranial fenestration is a plausible variant of a prominent MEV. Recognition on CT may prevent misinterpretation as vascular duplication or pathology and may influence mastoid, retrosigmoid, and endovascular planning in the mastoid–suboccipital region.