Directional Atherectomy Versus Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty for Vessel Preparation Before Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in Moderate-to-Severe Calcified Lesions
摘要
This study aimed to compare directional atherectomy (DA) and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for vessel preparation before drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in moderately to severely calcified peripheral artery disease.
Materials and MethodsThis study is a sub-analysis of the Evolusion study. Inverse probability weighting was applied to balance the two groups. The primary endpoints were freedom from major adverse events (f-MAE), freedom from all-cause mortality (f-ACM), and major adverse limb events (MALE). Secondary endpoints included Rutherford classification improvement rate, bailout stent implantation rate, and bailout stent length.
ResultsA total of 337 patients were included (254 in POBA group, 83 in DA group). POBA had higher bailout stent implantation rate (28.7% vs 16.9%, p = 0.004) and longer mean stent length (159.0 ± 78.8 mm vs 119.3 ± 58.9 mm, p < 0.001); DA enabled larger-diameter DCBs (5.11 ± 0.69 mm vs 4.73 ± 0.62 mm, p < 0.01). Over 24 months, POBA had 43 deaths (41.9% cardiovascular) and 15 post-procedural reinterventions; DA had 4 deaths and 5 reinterventions. POBA also showed lower f-MAE (78.4% vs 85.4%, p = 0.027) and f-ACM (83.2% vs 92.7%, p = 0.0035), plus higher cumulative MALE (8.5% vs 4.8%, p = 0.006). DA had greater Rutherford category improvement, reaching 89.1% vs 71.3% at 24 months.
ConclusionIn patients with calcified lesions, DA-based vessel preparation before DCB therapy was associated with superior clinical outcomes, including higher f-MAE and f-ACM, lower MALE rates, reduced bailout stenting, shorter stent length, and greater improvement in Rutherford category, compared with POBA.
Graphical Abstract