Scholarlink

Background <p>Hypertrophy of the labia minora is a common condition in female vulvar deformities. This study introduces a modified wedge-shaped labiaplasty—the double-L incision-excision method—based on the principles of Custom Flask Labiaplasty. The method aims to enhance both the aesthetic and functional outcomes in labia minora reduction surgery.</p> Objectives <p>To evaluate clinical effect of double-L incision for labia minora reduction.</p> Methods <p>From October 2019 to June 2024, we performed labia minora reduction surgery on 18 cases of labia minora hypertrophy using a double-L incision-excision method. The surgical method involves drawing two L-shaped incision marks on the inner side of each labia minora. The L-shaped lines start at the edge of the labia minora and end near the base of the labia minora. The amount of tissue removed is determined by adjusting the angles of the two lines forming the “L.” After full-thickness excision of the labia minora tissue between the double-L design, the wound edges on both sides are sutured in position.</p> Results <p>For the 18 patients who received surgery, the incisions healed well without complications. None of the patients had obvious scars at the incision areas. In each case, the morphology of the labia minora was significantly improved, the appearance was natural, the edge did not change in color, and the effect was satisfactory.</p> Conclusion <p>The double-L incision-excision method for labia minora reduction surgery yields favorable postoperative results. It allows for more precise control over the size of the labia minora, with a smooth and natural appearance following surgery. This method is safe, effective, and ideal for labia minora plastic surgery.</p> Level of Evidence IV <p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors &#xa0;<a href="http://www.springer.com/00266">www.springer.com/00266</a>.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Double-L Incision-Excision Method for Labia Minora Reduction: A New Perspective on Custom Flask Labiaplasty

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月27日

查看全文
  • Tingfeng Xiong,
  • Jiang Zhang,
  • Aawrish Khan,
  • Haiyan Cui

摘要

Background

Hypertrophy of the labia minora is a common condition in female vulvar deformities. This study introduces a modified wedge-shaped labiaplasty—the double-L incision-excision method—based on the principles of Custom Flask Labiaplasty. The method aims to enhance both the aesthetic and functional outcomes in labia minora reduction surgery.

Objectives

To evaluate clinical effect of double-L incision for labia minora reduction.

Methods

From October 2019 to June 2024, we performed labia minora reduction surgery on 18 cases of labia minora hypertrophy using a double-L incision-excision method. The surgical method involves drawing two L-shaped incision marks on the inner side of each labia minora. The L-shaped lines start at the edge of the labia minora and end near the base of the labia minora. The amount of tissue removed is determined by adjusting the angles of the two lines forming the “L.” After full-thickness excision of the labia minora tissue between the double-L design, the wound edges on both sides are sutured in position.

Results

For the 18 patients who received surgery, the incisions healed well without complications. None of the patients had obvious scars at the incision areas. In each case, the morphology of the labia minora was significantly improved, the appearance was natural, the edge did not change in color, and the effect was satisfactory.

Conclusion

The double-L incision-excision method for labia minora reduction surgery yields favorable postoperative results. It allows for more precise control over the size of the labia minora, with a smooth and natural appearance following surgery. This method is safe, effective, and ideal for labia minora plastic surgery.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266.