Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To evaluate whether imageless handheld robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) can achieve time neutrality compared with manual TKA (mTKA) within a standardised workflow, while assessing operating-room (OR) efficiency, environmental impact, and intraoperative workload demand.</p> Methods <p>In this prospective study, 24 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were stratified to either rTKA (<i>n</i> = 12) or mTKA (<i>n</i> = 12). A process analysis captured 75 timestamps per case and quantified preparation, surgical, breakdown, turnover, and total OR times. Instrument trays were counted and weighed; reprocessing-related water and electricity consumption and costs were estimated. Perceived workload demand was assessed after both rTKA and mTKA using the NASA Task Load Index.</p> Results <p>No statistically significant differences were observed between rTKA and mTKA for any OR time interval (total OR time 79.8 ± 8.1 vs. 75.8 ± 5.3&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> = 0.19; mean surgical time 40.3 ± 4.2 vs. 37.3 ± 3.9&#xa0;min, <i>p</i> = 0.10 for rTKA vs. mtKA respectively). The reduction of one tray for rTKA cases corresponded to estimated savings of €13,900, 3,900 L of water, and 140 kWh of electricity in sterilisation based on an annual volume of 250 cases. For rTKA, the NASA-TLX domain scores demonstrated lower perceived workload and frustration for rTKA than for mTKA (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with a significantly higher perceived performance rating (<i>p</i> = 0.025).</p> Conclusion <p>Imageless handheld rTKA achieved time neutrality compared with mTKA in a standardised high-volume workflow and was associated with reduced intraoperative workload demand. These findings support the feasibility of integrating handheld robotic assistance without compromising OR efficiency, while potentially improving staff experience and reducing resource utilisation, thereby contributing to value-based arthroplasty care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Time neutrality and reduced ecological burden – handheld robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves operating room efficiency compared with manual total knee arthroplasty

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月1日

查看全文
  • Ricarda Stauss,
  • Hendrik Pott,
  • Peter Savov,
  • Thorsten M. Seyler,
  • Michael P. Ast,
  • Catherine Whittall,
  • Max Ettinger

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate whether imageless handheld robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) can achieve time neutrality compared with manual TKA (mTKA) within a standardised workflow, while assessing operating-room (OR) efficiency, environmental impact, and intraoperative workload demand.

Methods

In this prospective study, 24 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were stratified to either rTKA (n = 12) or mTKA (n = 12). A process analysis captured 75 timestamps per case and quantified preparation, surgical, breakdown, turnover, and total OR times. Instrument trays were counted and weighed; reprocessing-related water and electricity consumption and costs were estimated. Perceived workload demand was assessed after both rTKA and mTKA using the NASA Task Load Index.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed between rTKA and mTKA for any OR time interval (total OR time 79.8 ± 8.1 vs. 75.8 ± 5.3 min, p = 0.19; mean surgical time 40.3 ± 4.2 vs. 37.3 ± 3.9 min, p = 0.10 for rTKA vs. mtKA respectively). The reduction of one tray for rTKA cases corresponded to estimated savings of €13,900, 3,900 L of water, and 140 kWh of electricity in sterilisation based on an annual volume of 250 cases. For rTKA, the NASA-TLX domain scores demonstrated lower perceived workload and frustration for rTKA than for mTKA (all p < 0.001), with a significantly higher perceived performance rating (p = 0.025).

Conclusion

Imageless handheld rTKA achieved time neutrality compared with mTKA in a standardised high-volume workflow and was associated with reduced intraoperative workload demand. These findings support the feasibility of integrating handheld robotic assistance without compromising OR efficiency, while potentially improving staff experience and reducing resource utilisation, thereby contributing to value-based arthroplasty care.