Purpose <p>The purpose of this study was to compare knee range of motion and 2011 Knee Society Score (2011KSS) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in background–matched cohort.</p> Methods <p>UKA and TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis were included, and preoperative patient backgrounds, knee alignment, osteoarthritis severity, knee range of motion, 2011KSS symptoms, satisfaction and functional activities were matched using a propensity score. Knee range of motion and 2011KSS were evaluated two&#xa0;year postoperatively.</p> Results <p>Among 116 UKAs and 656 TKAs, 98 each arthroplasty were matched (mean 75&#xa0;years). UKA showed greater knee flexion (mean: 136.6° vs 122.4°, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 2011KSS functional activities (median: 78 vs 68, <i>p</i> = 0.04) at 2-year. There were no differences in knee extension or other 2011KSS domains.</p> Conclusion <p>UKA showed greater knee flexion and subjective functional score than TKA. UKA may be beneficial for populations with high flexion demands.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Greater knee flexion and patient-reported function after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than after total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score–matched study

  • Kohei Nishitani,
  • Shinichi Kuriyama,
  • Yugo Morita,
  • Sayako Sakai,
  • Shinichiro Nakamura,
  • Shuichi Matsuda

摘要

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare knee range of motion and 2011 Knee Society Score (2011KSS) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in background–matched cohort.

Methods

UKA and TKA for medial knee osteoarthritis were included, and preoperative patient backgrounds, knee alignment, osteoarthritis severity, knee range of motion, 2011KSS symptoms, satisfaction and functional activities were matched using a propensity score. Knee range of motion and 2011KSS were evaluated two year postoperatively.

Results

Among 116 UKAs and 656 TKAs, 98 each arthroplasty were matched (mean 75 years). UKA showed greater knee flexion (mean: 136.6° vs 122.4°, p < 0.001) and 2011KSS functional activities (median: 78 vs 68, p = 0.04) at 2-year. There were no differences in knee extension or other 2011KSS domains.

Conclusion

UKA showed greater knee flexion and subjective functional score than TKA. UKA may be beneficial for populations with high flexion demands.