Scholarlink

Background <p>Modular dual mobility (MDM) cups are widely used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce dislocation, but their impact on range of motion (ROM) to impingement versus single-mobility (SM) cups remains uncertain.</p> Methods <p>In this paired robotic-simulation study, 108 primary robotic-assisted THAs were virtually planned twice with CT-based software, once with an SM cup and once with an MDM cup. Cup and stem orientation were optimised to restore intra-articular length and global offset within 5&#xa0;mm of the contralateral hip and to avoid impingement. ROM to first impingement was measured in extension/external rotation (ER), flexion/internal rotation (IR) with physiological pelvic tilt, and flexion/IR with 20° adduction. The mode of first impingement (intra-articular, extra-articular, or mixed) was recorded.</p> Results <p>Compared with SM, MDM cups increased ROM to impingement in extension and ER but slightly reduced ROM in flexion and IR at several test positions. Maximal extension to impingement and ER in extension were higher with MDM, whereas flexion with pelvic anteversion and IR at 100° flexion were lower. ROM to impingement was not uniformly greater with MDM, and first contact often shifted from intra-articular implant-on-implant impingement toward extra-articular impingement.</p> Conclusion <p>In robotic THA, MDM cups provide selective gains in ROM to impingement and shift the impingement towards extra-articular structures rather than providing a global increase in safe ROM. Clinically, MDM may suit patients needing extension/ER reserve or with anterior instability risk, and planning should consider osteophytes and bony constraints. Further prospective clinical validation is warranted.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Beyond jump distance: modular dual mobility versus single mobility cups in robotic total hip arthroplasty - simulation of hip kinematics and impingement

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月5日

查看全文
  • Pascal Kouyoumdjian,
  • Youssef Jamaleddine,
  • Emeline Chapron,
  • Ahmad Haj Hussein,
  • Mohammad Al Suwaidi,
  • Rémy Coulomb

摘要

Background

Modular dual mobility (MDM) cups are widely used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce dislocation, but their impact on range of motion (ROM) to impingement versus single-mobility (SM) cups remains uncertain.

Methods

In this paired robotic-simulation study, 108 primary robotic-assisted THAs were virtually planned twice with CT-based software, once with an SM cup and once with an MDM cup. Cup and stem orientation were optimised to restore intra-articular length and global offset within 5 mm of the contralateral hip and to avoid impingement. ROM to first impingement was measured in extension/external rotation (ER), flexion/internal rotation (IR) with physiological pelvic tilt, and flexion/IR with 20° adduction. The mode of first impingement (intra-articular, extra-articular, or mixed) was recorded.

Results

Compared with SM, MDM cups increased ROM to impingement in extension and ER but slightly reduced ROM in flexion and IR at several test positions. Maximal extension to impingement and ER in extension were higher with MDM, whereas flexion with pelvic anteversion and IR at 100° flexion were lower. ROM to impingement was not uniformly greater with MDM, and first contact often shifted from intra-articular implant-on-implant impingement toward extra-articular impingement.

Conclusion

In robotic THA, MDM cups provide selective gains in ROM to impingement and shift the impingement towards extra-articular structures rather than providing a global increase in safe ROM. Clinically, MDM may suit patients needing extension/ER reserve or with anterior instability risk, and planning should consider osteophytes and bony constraints. Further prospective clinical validation is warranted.