Scholarlink

Purpose <p>There is still a debate regarding the removal of the femoral stem due to the risk of trunnion. To answer this question, we conducted a study to compare long terms outcomes of isolated acetabular to total revision of MoM THA using an institutional arthroplasty registry.</p> Methods <p>From 1996 to 2019, 150 patients (12.5%) of the 1202 revision THAs (rTHA) recorded in Geneva Arthroplasty Registry (GAR) underwent a revision of a MoM THA. After matching the two groups,126 patients were finally included: 63 in each group. The mean age was 64.4 (SD 11.6) years, 48.4% (61/126) were women with a mean BMI of 27.2 (SD 5.5) Kg/m2.</p> Results <p>The overall survival rate was 88.1% [79.9–97.2%] at ten years. 10-year survival rate was 93.5% [86.2–100.0%] after isolated acetabular rTHA and 79.5% [61.7–100.0%] after total rTHA (<i>p</i> = 0.16). Regarding Hip Harris score and Merle d’Aubigne score, no difference at last follow-up was observed between the two groups (respectively: <i>p</i> = 0.39; <i>p</i> = 0.33). Regarding the chrome, cobalt, and nickel level reduction, no difference was observed between the two groups (respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.38, 0.81 and 0.97).</p> Conclusion <p>No difference was observed between isolated acetabular and total revision of MoM THAs regarding survival rate and ions levels at long term. It seems advisable to perform an isolated acetabular revision of a MoM THA when it is indicated.</p> Levels of evidence <p>Level III, case control studies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Isolated acetabular cup revision in Metal-on-Metal total hip arthroplasty: a low-complication strategy feasible in only half of cases

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月21日

查看全文
  • Cristobal Duda,
  • Pierre-Alban Bouché,
  • Morgan Gauthier,
  • Amanda Gonzalez,
  • Matthieu Zingg,
  • Didier Hannouche

摘要

Purpose

There is still a debate regarding the removal of the femoral stem due to the risk of trunnion. To answer this question, we conducted a study to compare long terms outcomes of isolated acetabular to total revision of MoM THA using an institutional arthroplasty registry.

Methods

From 1996 to 2019, 150 patients (12.5%) of the 1202 revision THAs (rTHA) recorded in Geneva Arthroplasty Registry (GAR) underwent a revision of a MoM THA. After matching the two groups,126 patients were finally included: 63 in each group. The mean age was 64.4 (SD 11.6) years, 48.4% (61/126) were women with a mean BMI of 27.2 (SD 5.5) Kg/m2.

Results

The overall survival rate was 88.1% [79.9–97.2%] at ten years. 10-year survival rate was 93.5% [86.2–100.0%] after isolated acetabular rTHA and 79.5% [61.7–100.0%] after total rTHA (p = 0.16). Regarding Hip Harris score and Merle d’Aubigne score, no difference at last follow-up was observed between the two groups (respectively: p = 0.39; p = 0.33). Regarding the chrome, cobalt, and nickel level reduction, no difference was observed between the two groups (respectively, p = 0.38, 0.81 and 0.97).

Conclusion

No difference was observed between isolated acetabular and total revision of MoM THAs regarding survival rate and ions levels at long term. It seems advisable to perform an isolated acetabular revision of a MoM THA when it is indicated.

Levels of evidence

Level III, case control studies.