Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Pelvic ring and acetabular fractures pose significant morbidity and mortality risks due to substantial haemorrhage and internal organ injury. Many percutaneous reduction techniques involve manipulating the injured side while stabilizing the uninjured side, often requiring specific or costly equipment. This article presents a technique for creating a pelvic reduction frame using a standard external fixator.</p> Method <p>We included surgical pelvic ring fractures between 2018 and 2022. Pelvic reduction was achieved using an external fixator (Hoffmann III, Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA). Reduction quality was assessed according to the technique described by Lefaivre et al., based on the following criteria: mean asymmetry (mm), mean deformity index (mm), and mean maximum horizontal or vertical displacement (mm).</p> Results <p>15 patients (10 men, 5 women, mean age 35&#xa0;years) underwent surgical treatment for pelvic fractures using an external fixator and percutaneous fixation. Mean operative time was 130&#xa0;min (range, 80–276). Postoperative imaging showed a mean maximum displacement of 5.4&#xa0;mm and a mean asymmetry of 3.7&#xa0;mm, with excellent or good reductions in 11 cases.</p> Conclusion <p>This system uses widely available equipment and enables the benefits of percutaneous techniques, but surgical expertise remains the key to success.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Percutaneous pelvic ring fracture reduction using an external fixator: a technical trick and case series

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月2日

查看全文
  • Guillaume David,
  • Nicholas J. Tucker,
  • Clement Marc,
  • Vincent Steiger,
  • Louis Rony,
  • Cyril Mauffrey

摘要

Purpose

Pelvic ring and acetabular fractures pose significant morbidity and mortality risks due to substantial haemorrhage and internal organ injury. Many percutaneous reduction techniques involve manipulating the injured side while stabilizing the uninjured side, often requiring specific or costly equipment. This article presents a technique for creating a pelvic reduction frame using a standard external fixator.

Method

We included surgical pelvic ring fractures between 2018 and 2022. Pelvic reduction was achieved using an external fixator (Hoffmann III, Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA). Reduction quality was assessed according to the technique described by Lefaivre et al., based on the following criteria: mean asymmetry (mm), mean deformity index (mm), and mean maximum horizontal or vertical displacement (mm).

Results

15 patients (10 men, 5 women, mean age 35 years) underwent surgical treatment for pelvic fractures using an external fixator and percutaneous fixation. Mean operative time was 130 min (range, 80–276). Postoperative imaging showed a mean maximum displacement of 5.4 mm and a mean asymmetry of 3.7 mm, with excellent or good reductions in 11 cases.

Conclusion

This system uses widely available equipment and enables the benefits of percutaneous techniques, but surgical expertise remains the key to success.