Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To compare the depiction performance of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DE-CT) quantitatively and qualitatively for pancreatic cancer under reference conditions equivalent to 120 kVp, used in clinical practice.</p> Method <p>For this retrospective single-center study, 124 patients with pathologically proven pancreatic cancer who had undergone initial dynamic contrast-enhanced upper abdominal CT between January 2023 and October 2024 were included (PCD-CT: <i>n</i> = 62; DE-CT: <i>n</i> = 62). Reference images were 70&#xa0;keV virtual monoenergetic images for PCD-CT and 80/Sn150 kVp linearly blended images for DE-CT. The tumor-to-pancreas ratio (TPR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated in the pancreatic and equilibrium phases. After two radiologists rated tumor visibility independently using a five-point scale, the mean visibility score was analyzed. Group differences were assessed using Welch’s <i>t</i> test and linear regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, and tumor location. A predefined subgroup analysis was conducted for tumors ≤ 20&#xa0;mm (pancreatic phase).</p> Result <p>In the equilibrium phase, the visibility score was higher with PCD-CT than with DE-CT (3.065 vs. 2.548; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment (β = +0.305; <i>p</i> = 0.032). TPR and CNR were similar in both phases (pancreatic: TPR 0.495 vs. 0.537, <i>p</i> = 0.088; CNR 13.789 vs. 12.231, <i>p</i> = 0.246; equilibrium: TPR 1.027 vs. 1.017, <i>p</i> = 0.868; CNR 0.901 vs. 0.110, <i>p</i> = 0.597), as was pancreatic-phase visibility (4.250 vs. 4.065; <i>p</i> = 0.136). Results for tumors ≤ 20&#xa0;mm were consistent with the main analysis.</p> Conclusion <p>Under 120 kVp-equivalent conditions, PCD-CT and DE-CT showed comparable quantitative performance for pancreatic cancer, whereas PCD-CT provided superior subjective tumor visibility in the equilibrium phase, suggesting improved visual detectability without loss of quantitative image quality.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of pancreatic cancer on photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT using standard reference images

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月3日

查看全文
  • Takahito Niiyama,
  • Norihito Naruto,
  • Kazuma Nishikawa,
  • Ken Yamamoto,
  • Yasuhiro Kawahara,
  • Mariko Doai,
  • Aki Kido,
  • Kyo Noguchi

摘要

Purpose

To compare the depiction performance of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DE-CT) quantitatively and qualitatively for pancreatic cancer under reference conditions equivalent to 120 kVp, used in clinical practice.

Method

For this retrospective single-center study, 124 patients with pathologically proven pancreatic cancer who had undergone initial dynamic contrast-enhanced upper abdominal CT between January 2023 and October 2024 were included (PCD-CT: n = 62; DE-CT: n = 62). Reference images were 70 keV virtual monoenergetic images for PCD-CT and 80/Sn150 kVp linearly blended images for DE-CT. The tumor-to-pancreas ratio (TPR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated in the pancreatic and equilibrium phases. After two radiologists rated tumor visibility independently using a five-point scale, the mean visibility score was analyzed. Group differences were assessed using Welch’s t test and linear regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, and tumor location. A predefined subgroup analysis was conducted for tumors ≤ 20 mm (pancreatic phase).

Result

In the equilibrium phase, the visibility score was higher with PCD-CT than with DE-CT (3.065 vs. 2.548; p < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment (β = +0.305; p = 0.032). TPR and CNR were similar in both phases (pancreatic: TPR 0.495 vs. 0.537, p = 0.088; CNR 13.789 vs. 12.231, p = 0.246; equilibrium: TPR 1.027 vs. 1.017, p = 0.868; CNR 0.901 vs. 0.110, p = 0.597), as was pancreatic-phase visibility (4.250 vs. 4.065; p = 0.136). Results for tumors ≤ 20 mm were consistent with the main analysis.

Conclusion

Under 120 kVp-equivalent conditions, PCD-CT and DE-CT showed comparable quantitative performance for pancreatic cancer, whereas PCD-CT provided superior subjective tumor visibility in the equilibrium phase, suggesting improved visual detectability without loss of quantitative image quality.