<p>Over the past decade, radiomics has seen exponential growth, with over ten thousand publications in PubMed and a steady increase in related studies in journals like <i>Abdominal Radiology</i>. Despite the potential of radiomics, a major challenge lies in validating radiomics models, as most studies rely on single-center datasets with fixed-ratio splits, which can lead to variability in performance due to randomness in data splitting. Therefore, researchers should adopt more robust cross-validation methods rather than relying solely on the fixed-ratio holdout method to ensure robust and reliable radiomics model performance evaluation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The pitfalls of fixed-ratio data splitting in radiomics model performance evaluation

  • Haoru Wang

摘要

Over the past decade, radiomics has seen exponential growth, with over ten thousand publications in PubMed and a steady increase in related studies in journals like Abdominal Radiology. Despite the potential of radiomics, a major challenge lies in validating radiomics models, as most studies rely on single-center datasets with fixed-ratio splits, which can lead to variability in performance due to randomness in data splitting. Therefore, researchers should adopt more robust cross-validation methods rather than relying solely on the fixed-ratio holdout method to ensure robust and reliable radiomics model performance evaluation.