Scholarlink

Methods <p>We performed a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX Research Network. Adults undergoing PET or SPECT MPI without prior coronary revascularization were identified. The primary endpoint was invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 90 days, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a secondary endpoint. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to adjust for baseline differences.</p> Results <p>A total of 33,822 propensity-matched patients were included (PET n=16,911; SPECT n=16,911). At 90 days, ICA occurred less frequently after PET compared with SPECT (6.0% vs 6.8%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97; p=0.005). Conversely, PCI was more frequent following PET (0.9% vs 0.4%; RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.51-2.65; p&lt;0.001), indicating a higher angiography-to-PCI procedural yield. These findings were consistent across sex-based subgroups.</p> Conclusion <p>In a large real-world cohort, PET MPI was associated with fewer downstream invasive coronary angiograms and a higher procedural PCI yield compared with SPECT. These findings suggest that PET may improve selection of patients for invasive evaluation and enhance efficiency of downstream care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Downstream invasive coronary procedures following PET Versus SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a propensity-matched analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月11日

查看全文
  • Chadi Tabaja,
  • Issam Motairek,
  • Bryan Abadie,
  • Laura Young,
  • Venu Menon,
  • Wael A. Jaber

摘要

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX Research Network. Adults undergoing PET or SPECT MPI without prior coronary revascularization were identified. The primary endpoint was invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 90 days, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a secondary endpoint. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to adjust for baseline differences.

Results

A total of 33,822 propensity-matched patients were included (PET n=16,911; SPECT n=16,911). At 90 days, ICA occurred less frequently after PET compared with SPECT (6.0% vs 6.8%; RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97; p=0.005). Conversely, PCI was more frequent following PET (0.9% vs 0.4%; RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.51-2.65; p<0.001), indicating a higher angiography-to-PCI procedural yield. These findings were consistent across sex-based subgroups.

Conclusion

In a large real-world cohort, PET MPI was associated with fewer downstream invasive coronary angiograms and a higher procedural PCI yield compared with SPECT. These findings suggest that PET may improve selection of patients for invasive evaluation and enhance efficiency of downstream care.