Purpose <p>This study aimed to assess and compare the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging performance and high-risk prediction capabilities between [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).</p> Methods <p>Eligible participants with NDMM who underwent [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT between October 2021 and March 2025 were prospectively enrolled in this study (NCT05255926). The diagnostic and staging performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG were assessed and compared. The parameters including standardized uptake value (SUV), tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), total bone marrow uptake (TBMU), total bone marrow uptake volume (TBMV), and total burden score (TBS) were calculated. Independent predictors for high-risk NDMM were identified using single-factor and multivariate logistic regression.</p> Results <p>Sixty-nine participants (40 men) with a median age of 64&#xa0;years (interquartile range [IQR], 57–71.5&#xa0;years) were finally analysed. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT exhibited a higher positive detection rate (82.6% [57/69] vs. 53.6% [37/69],<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), maximum SUV (SUVmax; 13.5 vs. 5.3 <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), mean SUV (SUVmean; 3.5 vs. 2.9, <i>P</i> = 0.029), TLR (8.1 vs. 2.0, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), and TBS (45 vs. 4, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) than [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor-derived TBS<sub>CXCR4</sub>, TBMV<sub>CXCR4</sub>, and TBMU<sub>CXCR4</sub> positively correlated with bone marrow plasma cell percentage, β2-microglobulin, and total additive score, respectively. For Durie-Salmon PLUS staging, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor better identified advanced participants than did [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT (53 vs. 35; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). According to the Mayo mSMART 4.0 stratification system, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that SUVmean<sub>CXCR4</sub> (odds ratio [OR] = 1.752, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.085– 2.828, <i>P</i> = 0.022) and TBS<sub>CXCR4</sub> (OR = 1.041, 95% CI = 1.011–1.072, <i>P</i> = 0.008) were independent indicators for predicting high-risk NDMM.</p> Conclusion <p>In NDMM, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy, Durie-Salmon PLUS staging, and high-risk prediction capabilities than did [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT. [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-Pentixafor-derived SUVmean<sub>CXCR4</sub> and TBS<sub>CXCR4</sub> could accurately identify high-risk NDMM.</p> <p>Trial registration number: NCT05255926.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

[68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for Durie-Salmon PLUS staging and risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

  • Jie Chen,
  • Shuaihu Tang,
  • Li Liu,
  • Yueli Tian,
  • Yichun Wang,
  • Zhiwei Xiao,
  • Diankui Xing,
  • Fuling Zhou,
  • Chongjiao Li,
  • Yong He

摘要

Purpose

This study aimed to assess and compare the Durie-Salmon PLUS staging performance and high-risk prediction capabilities between [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

Methods

Eligible participants with NDMM who underwent [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET/CT between October 2021 and March 2025 were prospectively enrolled in this study (NCT05255926). The diagnostic and staging performance of [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [18F]FDG were assessed and compared. The parameters including standardized uptake value (SUV), tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR), total bone marrow uptake (TBMU), total bone marrow uptake volume (TBMV), and total burden score (TBS) were calculated. Independent predictors for high-risk NDMM were identified using single-factor and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Sixty-nine participants (40 men) with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57–71.5 years) were finally analysed. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT exhibited a higher positive detection rate (82.6% [57/69] vs. 53.6% [37/69], P < 0.001), maximum SUV (SUVmax; 13.5 vs. 5.3 P < 0.001), mean SUV (SUVmean; 3.5 vs. 2.9, P = 0.029), TLR (8.1 vs. 2.0, P < 0.001), and TBS (45 vs. 4, P < 0.001) than [18F]FDG. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor-derived TBSCXCR4, TBMVCXCR4, and TBMUCXCR4 positively correlated with bone marrow plasma cell percentage, β2-microglobulin, and total additive score, respectively. For Durie-Salmon PLUS staging, [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor better identified advanced participants than did [18F]FDG PET/CT (53 vs. 35; P < 0.001). According to the Mayo mSMART 4.0 stratification system, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that SUVmeanCXCR4 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.752, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.085– 2.828, P = 0.022) and TBSCXCR4 (OR = 1.041, 95% CI = 1.011–1.072, P = 0.008) were independent indicators for predicting high-risk NDMM.

Conclusion

In NDMM, [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy, Durie-Salmon PLUS staging, and high-risk prediction capabilities than did [18F]FDG PET/CT. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor-derived SUVmeanCXCR4 and TBSCXCR4 could accurately identify high-risk NDMM.

Trial registration number: NCT05255926.