Scholarlink

Purpose <p>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, cranial MRI, ultrasound and temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a direct comparison.</p> Methods <p>Consecutive patients with a suspicion of GCA and at least 2 diagnostic tests ≤ 7 days after initiation of glucocorticoids between June 2021 and June 2024, were included retrospectively. The gold standard for the diagnosis of GCA was the judgment of experienced clinicians after a follow-up of ≥ 6 months. Examinations were compared within subgroups undergoing the same tests.</p> Results <p>Sixty-one GCA patients and 50 patients with an alternative diagnosis were included. Combined cranial and large vessel PET/CT had the highest sensitivity (89% [95%CI 77–96%]) and specificity (98% [95%CI 88–100%]). Cranial PET/CT and TAB yielded a better sensitivity compared to temporal artery ultrasound (83% [95%CI 64–94%], 77% [95%CI 59–90%] and 55% [95%CI 36–74%], respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.023) without difference in specificity (100% [95%CI 100 − 84%], 95% [95%CI 76–100%] and 81% [95%CI 58–95%], respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.136). Cranial MRI had a sensitivity of 56% (95%CI 21–86%) and specificity of 82% (95%CI 48–98%). Large vessel PET/CT resulted in a better sensitivity compared to axillary artery ultrasound (68% [95%CI 45–86%] vs. 18% [95%CI 5–40%], <i>p</i> = 0.001) without difference in specificity (100% [95% CI 82–100%] vs. 90% [95%CI 67–99%], <i>p</i> = 0.50).</p> Conclusion <p>PET/CT had a better sensitivity than ultrasound and cranial MRI. TAB and cranial PET/CT had a similar diagnostic yield.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Direct comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, cranial MRI, ultrasound and temporal artery biopsy in giant cell arteritis

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月26日

查看全文
  • Lien Moreel,
  • Albrecht Betrains,
  • Lennert Boeckxstaens,
  • Griet Pieters,
  • Els Wuyts,
  • Birgit Weynand,
  • Inge Fourneau,
  • Koen Van Laere,
  • Philippe Demaerel,
  • Ellen De Langhe,
  • Steven Vanderschueren,
  • Daniel Blockmans

摘要

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, cranial MRI, ultrasound and temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a direct comparison.

Methods

Consecutive patients with a suspicion of GCA and at least 2 diagnostic tests ≤ 7 days after initiation of glucocorticoids between June 2021 and June 2024, were included retrospectively. The gold standard for the diagnosis of GCA was the judgment of experienced clinicians after a follow-up of ≥ 6 months. Examinations were compared within subgroups undergoing the same tests.

Results

Sixty-one GCA patients and 50 patients with an alternative diagnosis were included. Combined cranial and large vessel PET/CT had the highest sensitivity (89% [95%CI 77–96%]) and specificity (98% [95%CI 88–100%]). Cranial PET/CT and TAB yielded a better sensitivity compared to temporal artery ultrasound (83% [95%CI 64–94%], 77% [95%CI 59–90%] and 55% [95%CI 36–74%], respectively, p = 0.023) without difference in specificity (100% [95%CI 100 − 84%], 95% [95%CI 76–100%] and 81% [95%CI 58–95%], respectively, p = 0.136). Cranial MRI had a sensitivity of 56% (95%CI 21–86%) and specificity of 82% (95%CI 48–98%). Large vessel PET/CT resulted in a better sensitivity compared to axillary artery ultrasound (68% [95%CI 45–86%] vs. 18% [95%CI 5–40%], p = 0.001) without difference in specificity (100% [95% CI 82–100%] vs. 90% [95%CI 67–99%], p = 0.50).

Conclusion

PET/CT had a better sensitivity than ultrasound and cranial MRI. TAB and cranial PET/CT had a similar diagnostic yield.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.