Purpose PET/CT imaging data contains a wealth of quantitative information that can provide valuable contributions to characterising tumours. A growing body of work focuses on the use of deep-learning (DL) techniques for denoising PET data. These models are clinically evaluated prior to use, however, quantitative image assessment provides potential for further evaluation. This work uses radiomic features to compare two manufacturer deep-learning (DL) image enhancement algorithms, one of which has been commercialised, against ‘gold-standard’ image reconstruction techniques in phantom data and a sarcoma patient data set (N=20). Methods All studies in the retrospective sarcoma clinical [<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="259_2025_7149_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$^{18}$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>18</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>F]FDG dataset were acquired on either a GE Discovery 690 or 710 PET/CT scanner with volumes segmented by an experienced nuclear medicine radiologist. The modular heterogeneous imaging phantom used in this work was filled with [<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="259_2025_7149_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$^{18}$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>18</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>F]FDG, and five repeat acquisitions of the phantom were acquired on a GE Discovery 710 PET/CT scanner. The DL-enhanced images were compared to ‘gold-standard’ images the algorithms were trained to emulate and input images. The difference between image sets was tested for significance in 93 international biomarker standardisation initiative (IBSI) standardised radiomic features. Results Comparing DL-enhanced images to the ‘gold-standard’, 4.0% and 9.7% radiomic features measured significantly different (pcritical < 0.0005) in the phantom and patient data respectively (averaged over the two DL algorithms). Larger differences were observed comparing DL-enhanced images to algorithm input images with 29.8% and 43.0% of radiomic features measuring significantly different in the phantom and patient data respectively (averaged over the two DL algorithms). Conclusion DL-enhanced images were found to be similar to images generated using the ‘gold-standard’ target image reconstruction method with more than 80% of radiomic features not significantly different in all comparisons across unseen phantom and sarcoma patient data. This result offers insight into the performance of the DL algorithms, and demonstrate potential applications for DL algorithms in harmonisation for radiomics and for radiomic features in quantitative evaluation of DL algorithms.

Deep learning image enhancement algorithms in PET/CT imaging: a phantom and sarcoma patient radiomic evaluation

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年2月27日

查看全文

L. M. Bonney,
G. M. Kalisvaart,
F. H. P. van Velden,
K. M. Bradley,
A. B. Hassan,
W. Grootjans,
D. R. McGowan

摘要

Purpose

PET/CT imaging data contains a wealth of quantitative information that can provide valuable contributions to characterising tumours. A growing body of work focuses on the use of deep-learning (DL) techniques for denoising PET data. These models are clinically evaluated prior to use, however, quantitative image assessment provides potential for further evaluation. This work uses radiomic features to compare two manufacturer deep-learning (DL) image enhancement algorithms, one of which has been commercialised, against ‘gold-standard’ image reconstruction techniques in phantom data and a sarcoma patient data set (N=20).

Methods

All studies in the retrospective sarcoma clinical [ $^{18}$ $^{18}$ F]FDG dataset were acquired on either a GE Discovery 690 or 710 PET/CT scanner with volumes segmented by an experienced nuclear medicine radiologist. The modular heterogeneous imaging phantom used in this work was filled with [ $^{18}$ $^{18}$ F]FDG, and five repeat acquisitions of the phantom were acquired on a GE Discovery 710 PET/CT scanner. The DL-enhanced images were compared to ‘gold-standard’ images the algorithms were trained to emulate and input images. The difference between image sets was tested for significance in 93 international biomarker standardisation initiative (IBSI) standardised radiomic features.

Results

Comparing DL-enhanced images to the ‘gold-standard’, 4.0% and 9.7% radiomic features measured significantly different (p_critical < 0.0005) in the phantom and patient data respectively (averaged over the two DL algorithms). Larger differences were observed comparing DL-enhanced images to algorithm input images with 29.8% and 43.0% of radiomic features measuring significantly different in the phantom and patient data respectively (averaged over the two DL algorithms).

Conclusion

DL-enhanced images were found to be similar to images generated using the ‘gold-standard’ target image reconstruction method with more than 80% of radiomic features not significantly different in all comparisons across unseen phantom and sarcoma patient data. This result offers insight into the performance of the DL algorithms, and demonstrate potential applications for DL algorithms in harmonisation for radiomics and for radiomic features in quantitative evaluation of DL algorithms.