Scholarlink

<p>Peer review remains a cornerstone of scientific publishing, ensuring the integrity, rigor, and relevance of the biomedical literature. However, structured training in peer review is rarely provided, particularly for early-career clinicians and researchers who are increasingly invited to contribute. This article presents ten practical considerations aimed at supporting first-time reviewers in delivering high-quality, fair, and constructive evaluations. These include selecting appropriate review invitations, recognising the importance of mentorship, minimising bias, and maintaining ethical standards. By combining experiential insights with established principles, this guide seeks to demystify the peer-review process and promote best practices among emerging reviewers.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

10 Things I Wish I Knew Before My First Peer Review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月4日

查看全文
  • Alessia Callegari,
  • Sara Moscatelli,
  • Colin J. McMahon

摘要

Peer review remains a cornerstone of scientific publishing, ensuring the integrity, rigor, and relevance of the biomedical literature. However, structured training in peer review is rarely provided, particularly for early-career clinicians and researchers who are increasingly invited to contribute. This article presents ten practical considerations aimed at supporting first-time reviewers in delivering high-quality, fair, and constructive evaluations. These include selecting appropriate review invitations, recognising the importance of mentorship, minimising bias, and maintaining ethical standards. By combining experiential insights with established principles, this guide seeks to demystify the peer-review process and promote best practices among emerging reviewers.