Scholarlink

<p>In infants with ductal dependent pulmonary blood flow (DDPBF), clinicians face a critical choice between two interventions to secure stable pulmonary circulation: the Blalock–Taussig–Thomas (BTT) shunt and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting. While the BTT shunt has long been the standard palliative procedure, its risks have prompted interest in less invasive alternatives. This manuscript explores the psychological and institutional factors contributing to the growing preference for PDA stenting over surgical shunting in the management of DDPBF. Cognitive biases, public reporting of surgical outcomes, and family preferences significantly influence clinicians’ procedural decisions. Understanding these influences is essential to align clinical decisions with evidence-based practices, ensuring optimal care for patients while maintaining transparency and equity in procedural evaluation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Beyond the Evidence: Psychological and Institutional Factors Shaping Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stent Adoption

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月22日

查看全文
  • Stephen T. Dalby,
  • Daniel Fiedorek,
  • Joshua A. Daily

摘要

In infants with ductal dependent pulmonary blood flow (DDPBF), clinicians face a critical choice between two interventions to secure stable pulmonary circulation: the Blalock–Taussig–Thomas (BTT) shunt and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting. While the BTT shunt has long been the standard palliative procedure, its risks have prompted interest in less invasive alternatives. This manuscript explores the psychological and institutional factors contributing to the growing preference for PDA stenting over surgical shunting in the management of DDPBF. Cognitive biases, public reporting of surgical outcomes, and family preferences significantly influence clinicians’ procedural decisions. Understanding these influences is essential to align clinical decisions with evidence-based practices, ensuring optimal care for patients while maintaining transparency and equity in procedural evaluation.